FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

The bulk of the musical talk
BopEuph
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:51 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by BopEuph »

I wouldn't say there's not much benefit for non-competing over 3 valves for the low range, though it's certainly not preferable. I have a student with a non compensating Besson, and I'm working her low range. She's doing fine, though having to finger a half step lower is definitely confusing her.

But I'd say that a middle school doesn't need a 4 valve horn, and a high school doesn't need a compensating horn. The hardest low range thing I did in high school was the Jacob Fantasia, and the low stuff was accessible for the 4v King I was on.
Nick
BopEuph
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:51 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by BopEuph »

Ah. Point well taken.
Nick
User avatar
Ken Crawford
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 722
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:45 am
Location: Rexburg, ID

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Ken Crawford »

Are 6/4 tubas considered compensating instruments?
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11512
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by windshieldbug »

kmorgancraw wrote:Are 6/4 tubas considered compensating instruments?

Only in the way mid-life red Corvettes are... 8)
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
timothy42b
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 466
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:57 pm

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by timothy42b »

I have heard that compensating euphoniums lose that Eb low false tone series that some people find useful.

I haven't had enough experience to know if that's universally true. It has been true that the euphs I've played with solid false tones were noncompensating.
BopEuph
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 656
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:51 am
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by BopEuph »

timothy42b wrote:I have heard that compensating euphoniums lose that Eb low false tone series that some people find useful.
I had no clue euphoniums could play false tones at all! I tried them on my Willson when I first heard about them and couldn't get them, though they pop on trombone. I just thought euphoniums couldn't do it.
Nick
Eflatdoubler
bugler
bugler
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:00 am

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Eflatdoubler »

I had tried a few Jupiter 3 +1 NON-compensating euphoniums that were terrific! E flat had to be lipped, otherwise low D, D flat and C were fine fingered down a half step. No low B, but others have mentioned- there really isn't a need.
I prefer the shorter valve stroke of the non compensating horns too.
Three Valves
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4230
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:44 am
Location: With my fellow Thought Criminals

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Three Valves »

bloke wrote:Most here know this stuff, but (perhaps?) it's concise enough to copy/paste for band director friends who, perhaps, can identify a "compensating" instrument by appearance, but aren't certain what "compensating" does.
(maybe...?? if you do, mention that you're quoting "Mid-South Music, Inc." in Tennessee.)
Hey Buddy!!

When I try to find JP retailers in the USA here;

http://www.jpmusicalinstruments.com/Fin ... ckist.html" target="_blank

I click on;

Mid South Music
14670 Highway 193
Williston, Tennessee 38076
Phone: +1901 465 4739
Email: midsouthmusic@aol.com" target="_blank
Website: http://www.mid-southmusic.com/" target="_blank

And wind up here...

https://www.mid-southmusic.com/about" target="_blank

That ain't you!! :shock:
I am committed to the advancement of civil rights, minus the Marxist intimidation and thuggery of BLM.
User avatar
Sousaswag
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 317
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2017 6:12 pm

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Sousaswag »

I've played both a Yamaha 321 non comp 4 valve and own a Besson 968 comp. Really the only thing the Yamaha has over its 3 valve counterpart is an in tune C. Compensating in a school environment can be a hit or miss. For instance, my school had no euphoniums for a few years, and when we did, there was no way the director would give the nice Besson non comp 3+1 horns to anyone but kids in the top group.
Meinl Weston 5450RA Tuono
Willson 3200RZ-5
Three Valves
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4230
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:44 am
Location: With my fellow Thought Criminals

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Three Valves »

Joke's on him then, it would be worse if you started getting calls from his viola players!!

:tuba:
I am committed to the advancement of civil rights, minus the Marxist intimidation and thuggery of BLM.
timothy42b
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 466
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:57 pm

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by timothy42b »

BopEuph wrote:
timothy42b wrote:I have heard that compensating euphoniums lose that Eb low false tone series that some people find useful.
I had no clue euphoniums could play false tones at all! I tried them on my Willson when I first heard about them and couldn't get them, though they pop on trombone. I just thought euphoniums couldn't do it.
Well, they can, but they don't feel like on trombone.

I can play the valve register as false tones on trombone but they feel strained and they take a lot of effort.

Not so on euph. They pop out and feel like real notes. Open is Eb below the staff and it goes down more or less chromatically like you'd expect. I don't understand this but it is there.

It is not true for all euphs, and I don't know why. But like I said, I've been told compensation seems to prevent it.
User avatar
Peach
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 701
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:42 am
Location: London, UK

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Peach »

Eflatdoubler wrote: I prefer the shorter valve stroke of the non compensating horns too.
Unless short stroke valves, why would non-comps have shorter stroke than Comps?
In my experience they are the same...
Peach
User avatar
pwhitaker
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Springvale, Maine

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by pwhitaker »

1 fewer port per valve in the non-comps.
MISERICORDE, n.
A dagger which in mediaeval warfare was used by the foot soldier to remind an unhorsed knight that he was mortal.
- Devil's Dictionary - Ambrose Bierce
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Donn »

Mark Finley wrote:King horns have a shorter stroke than compensating euphoniums. Not sure why
The stroke is port size + space between ports, right? So one or both of those would have to account for it.
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11512
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by windshieldbug »

My guess is that we Yanks have all the patents on port size changes, which you'd need for ANY shorter strokes...
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Rick F
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1677
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:47 pm
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: FOR BAND DIRECTORS: compensating vs. non-compensating

Post by Rick F »

Mark Finley wrote:Yes but I'm not sure why King can make their valves with a shorter stroke but compensating euphoniums can't or don't
The Miraphone 5050 has a bit shorter action. I measured it at 3/4" (19.05mm) vs my Yamaha 641 which is 7/8" (22.225mm). That's 1/8" (3.175mm) shorter action. Not sure how the German engineers do that with a bore of .610" (15.494mm) through the main valve section of the M5050. I suspect it has to do with the bumps seen inside the ports of the pistons which allow a closer overlap of the tubing that connect the ports.

not a valve from M5050 - just image ref.
Image
Miraphone 5050 - Warburton mpc (Brandon Jones)
YEP-641S (on long-term loan to grandson)
DE mpc (102 rim; I-cup; I-9 shank)
Post Reply