Good Vaughn Williams Concerto Recordings
- craigpotter
- bugler

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:01 pm
- Location: Laurel, MD
Good Vaughn Williams Concerto Recordings
What are they and where can i get one
THanks
Craig
THanks
Craig
-
Mark E. Chachich
- 3 valves

- Posts: 481
- Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 6:07 pm
- Location: Maryland
My pick (there are other excellent recordings).
John Fletcher - tuba
Andre Previn - Conductor
London Symphony Orchestra
I think that it is reissued on CD by RCA
excellent musicianship, excellent orchestra, a fine English solo (yes, I like the VW) by fine English musicians
good luck,
Mark
John Fletcher - tuba
Andre Previn - Conductor
London Symphony Orchestra
I think that it is reissued on CD by RCA
excellent musicianship, excellent orchestra, a fine English solo (yes, I like the VW) by fine English musicians
good luck,
Mark
Mark E. Chachich, Ph.D.
Principal Tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Life Member, Musicians' Association of Metropolitan Baltimore, A.F.M., Local 40-543
Life Member, ITEA
Principal Tuba, Bel Air Community Band
Life Member, Musicians' Association of Metropolitan Baltimore, A.F.M., Local 40-543
Life Member, ITEA
- jtuba
- pro musician

- Posts: 713
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 8:35 am
- Location: Norfolk, VA
- Steve Marcus
- pro musician

- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:18 am
- Location: Chicago area
- Contact:
Rex Martin performed the VW a couple of years ago with the Ars Viva Symphony Orchestra, whose personnel are primarily Chicago Symphony Orchestra members.
Last edited by Steve Marcus on Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
- craigpotter
- bugler

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:01 pm
- Location: Laurel, MD
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
- Contact:
Re: Good Vaughn Williams Concerto Recordings
Here's my review of the Bell recording, which I think is musically valid and historically important:craigpotter wrote:What are they and where can i get one
THanks
Craig
viewtopic.php?t=7497
Also, I would strongly recommend that any tuba player should obtain Hans Nickel's recording. It's my favorite of all of them, but I think beyond that it is an important reference. Nickel, unlike Lind and Fletcher, actually play the music as it is marked in the published part. Anyone performing this work in front of a jury using the published music to judge the performance will risk attracting lots of complaints if they play it the way Fletcher or Lind played it. It won't match the music. There are anecdotes to suggest that the published work was edited incorrectly compared to the manuscript, but those judges won't know that.
Hans Nickel's recording is on the CD CanTUBAllada published by Valve-Hearts but now distributed and sold by World of Brass. Here's the link:
http://www.worldofbrass.com/acatalog/21310.html
Here's the Fletcher:
http://www.towerrecords.com/product.aspx?pfid=1067706
I can't seem to find the Lind anywhere at the moment, but someone will know where to find it.
Rick "it's late and sometimes I forget my middle name" Denney
Last edited by Rick Denney on Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Peach
- 4 valves

- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:42 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Good Vaughn Williams Concerto Recordings
You're getting the Fletcher which I'd recommend over all others if you can only have one. Really any serious student ought to have all available recordings - especially since there are so few available.
In my opinion they are each perfectly valid readings of the work and I don't think any great liberties are taken by any of the artists (nor on ANY recordings of the work I've heard). I happen to prefer the Fletch reading but it's just preference.
When you consider the massive variances in performances of Concertos by other instrumentalists (stock Violin & Piano Rep comes to mind), any differences in the VW recordings seem very minor.
Would like to hear opinions...
Rick, I'm not disagreeing, just asking: What differences exactly are you referring to between the Fletch, Lind and Nickel offerings?Rick Denney wrote:
Nickel, unlike Lind and Fletcher, actually play the music as it is marked in the published part. Anyone performing this work in front of a jury using the published music to judge the performance will risk attracting lots of complaints if they play it the way Fletcher or Lind played it. It won't match the music. There are anecdotes to suggest that the published work was edited incorrectly compared to the manuscript, but those judges won't know that.
In my opinion they are each perfectly valid readings of the work and I don't think any great liberties are taken by any of the artists (nor on ANY recordings of the work I've heard). I happen to prefer the Fletch reading but it's just preference.
When you consider the massive variances in performances of Concertos by other instrumentalists (stock Violin & Piano Rep comes to mind), any differences in the VW recordings seem very minor.
Would like to hear opinions...
Peach
-
Mark
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
- Contact:
Re: Good Vaughn Williams Concerto Recordings
Vaughan Williams apparently had long slur markings in many places, especially in the first movement, on his manuscript. A copy of that has made the rounds, though I've never seen it. Roger Bobo stated as much, and that he had a copy of it, at the Army conference a few years ago. The markings are indeed more consistent with the phrasings and articulations in the accompanying parts, near as I can tell from what I've heard about it.Peach wrote:Rick, I'm not disagreeing, just asking: What differences exactly are you referring to between the Fletch, Lind and Nickel offerings?
Apparently, Mr. Catelinet didn't want to (or couldn't) play it that way, and his approach was severely clipped even in sections where the accompanists played the slurred phrases. Also apparently, the Oxford printed edition reflects many of the decisions Catlinet made. The composer was there for the premiere and may have revised his manuscript according to the abilities of the player, or even because he preferred it that way; we don't know.
When I follow along the various recordings while reading the published tuba part, I see lots of staccato markings and marcato where Lind and to a lesser extent Fletcher play connected phrases more like the strings. Nickel articulates them as marked. But the difference between Nickel's approach and Catelinet's is that Nickel sells it with those markings.
Nickel also accomplishes something that I think only Bell also achieved (of the recordings I've heard): He brought out the humor in the work. I think we take this piece way too seriously. Vaughan Williams was not by any means taciturn though he could be intense. His sarcasm is mostly aimed at himself in the anecdotes that survive in the literature (e.g. "I know it looks wrong, and sounds wrong, but it's right"). There's no way the same guy that composed the Symphony in F Minor could have intended the Tuba Concerto to be intense and serious, especially in that first movement.
Fletcher's performance is masterful, but I wonder if the typical concerto competition jurist would complain that he strayed too far from the ink. In a regular performance situation, of course, this can be justified especially considering the (apparent) existence of the manuscript version.
Rick "who prefers the Nickel rendition in particular because of the humor" Denney
