saxhorn

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: saxhorn

Post by Rick Denney »

NuPhil wrote:what is the real difference between a saxhorn, wagner tuba, french tuba and a euphonium? no its not the beginning of a bad joke, I really want to know. ie. bore size, sound, overall size, traditional vs. non traditional number of valves.
You should purchase a copy of Clifford Bevan's The Tuba Family. The second edition is available from Piccolo Press, and I'm sure someone still remembers the contact address.

Saxhorns are upright instruments with bells pointed up and top-action valves, originally intended as a family of instruments from soprano to bass. French makers still market tenor tubas as "saxhorns," but there is little if any functional difference between them and other non-compensated tenor tubas. Some have as many as five valves. Bore size is in the 14-15mm range. Length is 9 feet, like any Bb baritone or euphonium, and the bell diameter is in the 10-inch vicinity.

Standard euphoniums, as originally figured by Boosey, Besson, Hawkes, Highams and so on are based on the saxhorn configuration (Besson, for example, was originally a French company). In the last two or three decades, bore sizes have trended upward, as have bell sizes. On British and British-inspired instruments, compensating valves are used on the more expensive instruments. They are 9 feet in length and therefore pitched in Bb. There is little functional difference between an American-style baritone and a British-style euphonium. The baritones tend to be older designs and therefore tend to have slightly smaller dimensions, but not by as much a margin as the differences between tubas of different lineage. Here are two typical examples: My 1938 Reynolds baritone has four valves, an upright 10.5" bell with top-action valves (saxhorn configuration), and a bore of .56". My 1974 Besson New Standard euphonium has four compensating valves, an 11-inch bell, and a bore of .58" (except through the compensation tubing, which is larger). Overall, it seems a little beefier, but the differences are not substantial. Many American-style baritones had front-action valves, which is a distinctly American configuration for tenor, bass, and contrabass tubas.

The French C tuba is also a saxhorn-style instrument, pitched in C (8 feet length of the open bugle), and equipped with six valves to cover the tuba tessitura. In all other dimensions, it is similar to a euphonium.

I would classify all Bb saxhorns, American-style baritones, the French C tuba, and euphoniums as variations on the general theme of tenor tuba. There are also rotary-valved instruments of German heritage in this category, and they also provide some differences. Though everyone has preferences and strongly held reasons for those preferences, all are generally interchangeable. From an organological perspective, I consider them to be conical-bore equivalents of valved bass trombones.

The sounds range from brighter for the narrower instruments to deeper for the fatter instruments, but they all have a mellowness characteristic of instruments with a conical taper. The variation of sound is no greater than the variation of sound across, say, contrabass tubas pitched in BBb or CC.

British baritones are different instruments. They compare to the tenor tubas above the same way that tenor trombones compare to bass trombones.

Wagnertuben are completely different than any of the above. They are slightly conical instruments of smaller general dimensions fitted with very small mouthpiece similar to French horns. They are usually played by hornists, and many have the valves on the left hand for the convenience of horn players. From a distance, they follow the general upright configuration of saxhorns, but their taper design is more like a horn.

Rick "amateur organologist, but only for tubas" Denney
tjonp
bugler
bugler
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Tenor Tuba

Post by tjonp »

I've always been confused about what makes a true tenor tuba different from a euphonium. From what I understand, the dimensions are the same as, or simular to, a tuba, but with the pitch of a euphonium. But I don't understand how it compares to the euphonium, in terms of bore, bell size, mouthpiece, etc.
User avatar
corbasse
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 474
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:52 pm
Location: Bruges, Belgium

Re: saxhorn

Post by corbasse »

Rick Denney wrote: Wagnertuben are completely different than any of the above. They are slightly conical instruments of smaller general dimensions fitted with very small mouthpiece similar to French horns.
A slight correction: Wagner tuba mouthpieces ARE french horn mpcs.

These abominations were built to get a saxhorn section in the orchestra used in Wagner's Ring operas. He couldn't get "real" saxhorns which were recently invented in Belgium/France, and had instruments made which the second quartet of french horns could play when needed.
Because of the strange marriage between the very narrow French horn leadpipe and the big saxhorn bell branch, they are impossible to play in tune (or at least it's extremely difficult)
Believe me, I've tried.

On the baritone/saxhorn/ euphonium difference: I was taught that saxhorns(baritones) had partly cylindrical tubing, and that euphoniums (euphoniae?) were conical throughout.

Michiel van der Linden
French horn player, aspiring to become a tubist soon
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: Tenor Tuba

Post by Rick Denney »

tjonp wrote:I've always been confused about what makes a true tenor tuba different from a euphonium. From what I understand, the dimensions are the same as, or simular to, a tuba, but with the pitch of a euphonium. But I don't understand how it compares to the euphonium, in terms of bore, bell size, mouthpiece, etc.
In looking at one of the rotary upright tenor tubas, it is apparent to me that they have a largish bell throat and bell, and a slightly larger bore than the average euphonium. I would say that they are no different than a Rudy Meinl or Alexander tuba is compared with, say, a King.

Rick "who wonders at the mouthpieces that are used with the Alexander 151" Denney
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: saxhorn

Post by Rick Denney »

corbasse wrote:On the baritone/saxhorn/ euphonium difference: I was taught that saxhorns(baritones) had partly cylindrical tubing, and that euphoniums (euphoniae?) were conical throughout.
That description only fits the difference between English-style baritones compared with tenor tubas (which, as a class, include American-style baritones). American baritones may not be quite as fat as modern euphoniums, but they are conical throughout. The tuning slide on my Reynolds, for example, is not reversible (not that it would really persuade me if it was--there are tubas with reversible slides that are still tubas).

There are many, many traditional descriptions of the differences between this and that, but every one that I've seen was either not based on actual measurements, or any differences in actual measurements were easily explained by other things, such as age and regional variation. For example, the smallest bore I've seen on instruments called baritones is about .56" (not including the so-called marching baritones, which are more like English baritones with a .5" bore). The largest measured in the same way is about .62". The difference is a little over 10%. Tubas, on the other hand, vary from as little as .656 to .830 for tubas of the same general size (a Conn 5J compared to a Cerveny Piggy). That's a difference greater than 25%.

Rick "who thinks the terms show much more variation than the instruments" Denney
User avatar
Alex C
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:34 am
Location: Cybertexas

Post by Alex C »

Holst, certainly one of the best composers for tenor tuba AND euphonium, is quoted as saying the difference between the euphonium and the tenor tuba is that a tenor tuba has no vibrato "else, a euphonium."

Or something like that. It's really a fine quote... wish I knew it.
dave
bugler
bugler
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:50 am
Location: Salinas, CA

Post by dave »

British baritones are different instruments. They compare to the tenor tubas above the same way that tenor trombones compare to bass trombones.
British baritones are still part of the spectrum. Bore is .501, which is just as close to the .556 as an Alex 151 (.613). The older (60's) Alex 151 takes a mouthpiece with a European shank. New ones take a bass tbone shank. The mouthpieces that Alexander supplied in the 60's had a moderate bowl dia. of 25mm, a moderate depth and a small throat dia.

What has seemed strange to me is that tubas come in such a wide variety of pitches, but they seem to keep the same bore and bell dia. across the entire range. To me, that is as unexpected as a peckhorn (upright Eb alto) with tenor tuba bore and bell size would be.

Dave
loic
lurker
lurker
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Location: lyon, france

Post by loic »

hello!
(sorry for my very poor english)
the more important difference between saxhorn and euphonium is the sound. the euphonium as a really round and mellow sound and the saxhorn has a more direct sound.
on the following link you have exemple of saxhorn playing (marin_marais.mp3) and euphonium playing by the same player (seb_boutry_3.mp3).

http://saxhorneuphonium.free.fr/mp3/mp3_player.php
loic
lurker
lurker
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 3:28 pm
Location: lyon, france

Post by loic »

hello!
(sorry for my very poor english)
the more important difference between saxhorn and euphonium is the sound. the euphonium as a really round and mellow sound and the saxhorn has a more direct sound.
on the following link you have exemple of saxhorn playing (marin_marais.mp3) and euphonium playing by the same player (seb_boutry_3.mp3).

http://saxhorneuphonium.free.fr/mp3/mp3_player.php
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Re: saxhorn

Post by Rick Denney »

manganaro wrote:
Rick Denney wrote: A slight correction: Wagner tuba mouthpieces ARE french horn mpcs.
actually most of the horn players I know out there use a slightly different mouthpiece for their wagner tubas, the same way we mostly use different mouthpieces for our F tubas. A regualr french horn mouthpiece will work fine, but a mouthpiece that has been designed to help folks play on those beastly things works better.
I didn't write what you quoted as being written by me. And I agree with what you say.

Rick "who thinks managing quotes is both harder and more important on the new forum" Denney
Post Reply