In defense of the Ophicleide

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8595
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Re: In defense of the Ophicleide

Post by iiipopes »

Magnificient! All we usually hear about are the deficiencies and defects of such instruments, and how the tuba became the successor, etc. It is wonderful to hear such musicality out of "archaic" "deficient" "limited" instruments, in spite of the famous Berlioz quote. Again, it's not the instrument, it's the performer who makes it great.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
J.c. Sherman
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: In defense of the Ophicleide

Post by J.c. Sherman »

Chuck Jackson wrote: If I'm not mistaken, the original was for viola in the keys of C minor/C Major which were kept for the bassoon edition, thus negating anything lower than a C, that note being the lowest open string on the Viola. Are you sure the performer is not doing a newer transcription?

Chuck
I'll have to look it up, but I was referring to a different work... though this is a nice bassoon transcription by the composer.
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium, Cleveland State University
Principal Tuba, Firelands Symphony Orchestra
President, Variations in Brass
http://www.jcsherman.net
Post Reply