If YOU selected the audition materials - orchestra

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
ZNC Dandy
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 742
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:59 pm

Post by ZNC Dandy »

Bruckner 5,6,8,9 I haven't seen these on many audition lists as of late. Also, whoever suggested Garcia Lorca was right on. Same goes for whoever suggested King Lear Also, if there is a Pops orchestra to be considered, perhaps some movie score parts, like Hook, Jabba, Rocketeer, Private Ryan, etc. would be beneficial.
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Mark wrote:The problem with this work is that it is not in the public domain. In fact, it's rental, so I doubt any orchestra would even be allowed to issue parts to those chosen for a live audition.
That's no problem. I expect Oxford would readily grant permission to issue an audition page with the necessary excerpts.

Oxford also sells study scores of the RVW 4th for a few bucks. I know; I have one. That would provide the necessary context, it seems to me. And it would force auditionees to consider the audition material the way they have to consider much of the music they will play in the orchestra.

It certainly would not be the only common audition material still held under copyright protection.

Rick "noting that 'American in Paris' is still copyrighted" Denney
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

windshieldbug wrote:That's what the sight-reading portion is for... you don't give out any parts!
Yes, watching 15 finalists sight-read the RVW 4th would certainly separate the wheat from the chaff. Or, at least, identify those who know the literature beyond the standard excerpts!

Rick "who can't even listen to it in proper rhythm" Denney
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Jonathantuba wrote:My gosh - I will have to check that one out! The conductor of my orchestra is talking about that being the next RVW symphony we will play :shock:
Quoting Mike Sanders: "It may be the most difficult orchestral tuba part in the repertoire."

Quoting Matt Good: "...you just hang on for dear life"

My fault if I misquoted slightly (I'm going on memory, some of it quite old), but I think I'm close enough to increase your level of apprehension as much as possible, heh, heh.

That said, it is one of my favorite works by any composer: Taut, angry, and powerful. Tuneful when needed, but nobody can accuse Vaughan Williams of romanticism in it, and you also won't find any obvious reference to folk song though it has its modal moments. It verges on unrelenting. I cannot listen to it passively.

The solo in the third movement is really a duet with bassoon, and it is a not-too-difficult opening to a fugal section in the scherzo. The hard part is the rhythmic counterpoint to one of the melodies in the scherzo. It's technical enough to make you want your Eb, but the power of the piece begs for the big horn, even though RVW probably had to endure his 1937 premiere played on a Barlow F tuba.

But the more difficult aspect may be for the orchestra as a whole, and for the conductor. That may be why it is not programmed often. It's very difficult for me to follow the score, and I can't imagine how the conductor provides time in some spots. It isn't just the tuba player who gets a workout. If you have a conductor willing to attempt it, then it would be worth figuring out how to play the tuba part.

Rick "who would have to hire a sub" Denney
Post Reply