end of shank

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10424
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Dan Schultz »

Mike Finn wrote:
TubaTinker wrote:... until mouthpiece manufacturers develop an exact size for the end of their shanks it's not going to make much difference.
:shock:

And I would respectfully submit, that until TUBA manufactures develop an exact size for their receivers...
:oops:

Thank goodness for Matt Walters!
MF
There is truth in what you say. However, I submit that I have a dozen different mouthpieces with a dozen different shank dimensions. Where I'm going here is that what tuba players often perceive as a mouthpiece cup shape making a difference in how their horns sounds might actually be how the taper fits the receiver.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
KevinMadden
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Ledgewood, NJ / Lincoln, NE

Post by KevinMadden »

Mike Finn wrote:
Thank goodness for Matt Walters!
MF
I love my horn's AGR!!! :D :D :D :D
Ithaca College, B.M. 2009
University of Nebraska - Lincoln, M.M. 2017, D.M.A. 2020
Wessex Artiste
Wessex "Grand" BBb, Wessex Solo Eb, Wessex Dulce
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

KevinMadden wrote:
Mike Finn wrote:
Thank goodness for Matt Walters!
MF
I love my horn's AGR!!! :D :D :D :D
Then you should thank goodness for Steve Dillon. He holds the patent on it.
User avatar
Mike Finn
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 9:27 am
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Contact:

Post by Mike Finn »

KevinMadden wrote:
Mike Finn wrote:
Thank goodness for Matt Walters!
MF
I love my horn's AGR!!! :D :D :D :D

...just for the sake of clarity, I was referring to the post by Matt Walters describing (defining) the various shank sizes. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who copy/pasted it to a Word document for future reference. Anyone got a link? There was even talk of making it a permanent addition somewhere, maybe in the tips section.
:idea:
MF
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10424
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Dan Schultz »

What is the consensus regarding the optimum mouthpiece/receiver gap for a tuba?
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Re: Receivers and believers

Post by Chuck(G) »

Pop Korn wrote:Blow smoke gently into a bass. Play for as long as it takes for the smoke to come out. That's how fast air moves through..
How does one play and blow smoke through a bass at the same time?

Image

...and even though I said pretty much the same thing, I can appreciate the original question. The end of the mouthpiece isn't far from the throat--and changes to the throat can have a significant effect on playing characteristics, as can things such as leadpipe taper.
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Re: Receivers and believers

Post by Donn »

Pop Korn wrote:Now very little air goes through any brass instrument.
Relative to the volume of the tuba, that's sure true, but relative to our puny lungs it can seem like a lot sometimes. At the narrow end, it isn't obvious that the air flow is insignificant.
Post Reply