The edge can be taken off. Just take your foot off the pedal a bit.Bandmaster wrote:What he said....ztuba wrote:the LM-5 is better for loud playing than the LM-12 because you are going to get more overtones and your core sound will blanket your band instead of just being an annoying cutting sound that blazes through the ensemble with a crass and nasty sound. Bass instruments are supposed to blanket the air with a warm wrap of sound ... not cut through it with like a knife. You can get way more volume out front with the deep mouthpiece than the shallow one because of the increased amount of overtones in your sound. Sounding louder does not always mean more sound out front. Listen to some recordings of warren deck. that LM-5 is based on his old mouthpiece and he buried everyone. No edge = more tuba in the mix... unless you want to sound like you are running around with a really large cimbasso.And well said too!
I have an LM-10 that I play around with from time to time but it sounds a little to bright for my taste. It could be usefull on solo work though. I have some friends that got LM-12's and they sounded nasty on them. No tone... just edge. I had to hold back some in the very good 60 piece community band I play in while using a GW Taku and my York-Master. Now with my Holton and that Taku I can, if I really want to, bury the band with a low rumble with no edge on the sound. That's what ensemble playing is all about...I consider the LM-12 a gimick mouthpiece kind of like the Dr. Young Reynolds mouthpiece. Fun but not really usable.
I disagree with the statement "...bury the band with a low rumble with no edge on the sound. That's what ensemble playing is all about... ". There are definitely times when tubas can be too dark. "Darkness" is definitely a desirable trait in your tone, but not 100% of the time.


