Whatever you say.......it just seems peculiar to this mammoth owner, to be on a tuba discussion forum and see the name of his model of tuba (even in a generic sense) used to describe an aspect of different make of instrument, to the exclusion of the instrument that actually has that name.Rick Denney wrote:Just because Martin decided to take a word out of the dictionary and use it as a model name doesn't mean I can no longer use the word for its original purpose.
You lost me there.......are you saying Martin "Handcrafts" were not hand made? That's exactly what Martin's catalog claimed.....that "Handcraft" Martin Mediums, Monsters, and Mammoths were essentially handmade from top to bottom.....I'll save you a lengthy quote about hand-bending bows, hand-fitting valves and slides, hand-hammered bells, etc......Rick Denney wrote:Rick "thinking a Martin Mammoth is no larger (vis a vis a RM 6/4) than a Martin Handcraft is handmade (vis a vis a RM anything)" Denney
I wonder if you're confusing the model name of the instrument (Medium, Monster, Mammoth), with the "build quality" (Handcraft).
Martin Handcraft instruments came with a 50-year guarantee against defects in materials and workmanship. They were built to a quality standard, not a price point.

