I'm curious (perhaps you or someone else can answer)... I played Pictures with my univeristy's orchestra earlier this semester. I'm not a music major with super powers (just an engineering grad student) so I passed Bydlo on to a euphonium player who played it beautifully. I played the rest of Pictures on my CC horn--I really didn't see any need to pull out my F for anything. Where did you use an F vs. a CC in the rest of the piece? Admitedly my CC is not a BAT, so maybe that's the difference.MellowSmokeMan wrote:What a concert that was. I has the "Tommy Johnson Bydlo horn", my Rudy 6V F, and the Yorkbrunner all lined up on the floor around me. I felt like I was part of a circus act. Two times when I switched around horns or spun the Yorkbrunner I could hear some retard in the audience talking about it. It was quite entertaining from both sides of the stage I figure.
Another thing. We all talk about using a euphonium to remaining faithful to Ravel's expectations for Bydlo. If this is the case, then why do we turn around and use a BAT-ish instrument on the big low brass parts in other movements? Using a BAT on these parts must surely yield a completely different color than Ravel was expecting when he wrote the piece for a 6 valved euphonium. I suppose, in the end, it all comes down to choosing the instrument that makes the best sounding music no matter what was around 100 years ago.
Please enlighten the ignorant

-Evan