No. The 606 was modeled on an old York 4/4 instrument.ZachDomrese wrote:I was wonderin if you guys would consider this (a PT-606p) a BAT.
Rick "not even a 5/4" Denney
No. The 606 was modeled on an old York 4/4 instrument.ZachDomrese wrote:I was wonderin if you guys would consider this (a PT-606p) a BAT.

IMHO, I would probably call it a 4/4+ or even a small 5/4 - lots of people running around with 1291/1292's insist they are 5/4 horns (I personally don't), and I would put the 606 in that league.Rick Denney wrote:No. The 606 was modeled on an old York 4/4 instrument.ZachDomrese wrote:I was wondering if you guys would consider this (a PT-606p) a BAT.
Rick "not even a 5/4" Denney

Ditto - the 606/Yorks are the quintessence of "4/4" Tuba.MartyNeilan wrote:IMHO, I would probably call it a 4/4+ or even a small 5/4 - lots of people running around with 1291/1292's insist they are 5/4 horns (I personally don't), and I would put the 606 in that league.Rick Denney wrote:No. The 606 was modeled on an old York 4/4 instrument.ZachDomrese wrote:I was wondering if you guys would consider this (a PT-606p) a BAT.
Rick "not even a 5/4" Denney

J.c.S. it isn't clear whom you are 'ditto-ing' - presumably Rick?J.c. Sherman wrote:Ditto - the 606/Yorks are the quintessence of "4/4" Tuba.MartyNeilan wrote:IMHO, I would probably call it a 4/4+ or even a small 5/4 - lots of people running around with 1291/1292's insist they are 5/4 horns (I personally don't), and I would put the 606 in that league.Rick Denney wrote: Rick "not even a 5/4" Denney
J.c.S.




If i remember, he was about 6' tall.bort wrote:Funny to see a Rudy 6/4 with nothing alongside for a sense of scale. It looks almost normal, instead of comically large.


I have refrained from posting photos of Rudy 6/4 tubas being held or played by their owners in deference to their privacy.bort wrote:Funny to see a Rudy 6/4 with nothing alongside for a sense of scale. It looks almost normal, instead of comically large.

If I was out of line with the photo above, let me know and I can remove it. It was taken from the archives of tubenet after the gentleman in the photo posted it himself.Steve Marcus wrote:I have refrained from posting photos of Rudy 6/4 tubas being held or played by their owners in deference to their privacy.bort wrote:Funny to see a Rudy 6/4 with nothing alongside for a sense of scale. It looks almost normal, instead of comically large.


5th valve? why?Steve Marcus wrote: Words cannot express...
Except...
Imagine how much more dangerous one of these beasts would be with a 5th valve...




I'm not worthy! (kneels)pwhitaker wrote:Here are my 3 favorites: 2 current (Conn 20J and Holton BBb) and 1 former (5/4 Rudy Meinl BBb).


I want that horn!!Willing to do odd jobs...Do I have to join the service again to get it?? <s>Do you think they'll take me at 66?? haha Do these really big horns ever come up for sale used??Where would be the best place to look?.... Thanks..bigbob
Bob, if you come back to the Army conference next year, ask about it at the first reading session. There is usually a fellow in the Army who brings his Rudy 6/4 (not the fellow in the picture). It is quite impressive.bigbob wrote:I want that horn!!Willing to do odd jobs...Do I have to join the service again to get it?? <s>Do you think they'll take me at 66?? haha Do these really big horns ever come up for sale used??Where would be the best place to look?.... Thanks..bigbob

My Holton does like it when I move lots of air, but the truth is that I don't really move lots of air compared to good players. But it doesn't really need more air than a good 4/4, and it works well with less than a lot of stuffy (by which I mean unresonant) tubas. Remember that resonance is a feedback phenomenon. The better the instrument sends back pulse reflections that reinforce outgoing pulses in the buzz, the easier it is to play.Rev Rob wrote:My question is how much air does it take to play one of these 6/4 tubas - especially the pedal bass notes? My guess is more than I can effectively produce.