Bruno Tilz Mouthpiece Comparisons?
-
Jobey Wilson
- pro musician

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 7:20 pm
- Location: Boston, MA
- Leland
- pro musician

- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
- Location: Washington, DC
Re: Bruno Tilz Mouthpiece Comparisons?
True about the rim feel & diameter, but the M1 (at least the one I've got) is shallower than the Conn. It plays with a brighter sound, and I used it for some solo recitals and whatnot.sbring wrote:IMHO, the Tilz-NEA M1 is almost identical to the standard UMI Conn Helleberg in rim feel and diameter, so if you look at how Tilz defines this rim, you know something. Inner and outer diameter are the same.
The M1 is, overall, probably more like a Schilke Helleberg II.
- Leland
- pro musician

- Posts: 1651
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
- Location: Washington, DC
Re: Bruno Tilz Mouthpiece Comparisons?
With the "thumb test" (admittedly unscientific), my thumb goes into the regular CH about 1/8" more than into the M1.sbring wrote:Interesting, my CH and M1 have exactly the same distance from rim to throat.
Maybe the shape at the bottom of the cup affects how far my thumb can go in there.
(yes, we are still talking about mouthpieces...