Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces Bookmark and Share

The bulk of the musical talk
Forum rules
Reminder: "Go fund me" requests are not allowed and should be reported. All requests will be deleted.

Re: Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces

Postby MaryAnn » Thu May 17, 2018 10:15 am

I think one of the lesser considered uses for plastic pieces is for grade school kids, who drop mouthpieces on a frequent basis. A plastic piece won't make much of a dent in a bell, and you know what happens when a metal one hits the bell.
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:58 am

Re: Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces

Postby geomiklas » Thu May 17, 2018 10:18 am

MaryAnn wrote:I think one of the lesser considered uses for plastic pieces is for grade school kids, who drop mouthpieces on a frequent basis. A plastic piece won't make much of a dent in a bell, and you know what happens when a metal one hits the bell.


Excellent consideration. I agree all in that the Kelly 18 is great for kids, and other general playing. Like I stated in my OP, the middle range of the tuba works really well on the Lexan mouthpiece. It is the high Ophicleide and low contrabass range that presented the issues for me.
George's Website
SCHILLER AMERICAN HERITAGE 5U CC (MiraClone 186) & Ion Balu Wood Mute
MA Music Ed - Performance, Liberty U.(2019)
MEd Special Ed Slippery Rock U.(2006)
BM Music Ed - Tuba w/John Turk @ Dana School of Music / Youngstown St U (1991)
User avatar
geomiklas
bugler
bugler
 
Posts: 160
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 2:49 pm
Location: Lynchburg VA

Re: Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces

Postby Fergie » Thu May 17, 2018 10:43 am

smitwill1 wrote:I keep one in the glovebox (is it really a glovebox if no one keeps gloves in there anymore...) to buzz on while driving to a gig if I won't have time to play earlier in the day or in case I forget my "real" one.


Mouthpiece Box* :wink:
Dvorak probably wrote the the fourteen notes in New World Symphony to get his tuba friends a gig.
User avatar
Fergie
lurker
lurker
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 3:00 pm

Re: Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces

Postby NCSUSousa » Thu May 17, 2018 6:17 pm

timothy42b wrote:
Donn wrote:Contact dermatitis specifically can by reputation be acquired at any time, it isn't so much an inherent trait. That's why intimate contact with nickel is not recommended, for anyone.


I grew up not being sensitive to poison ivy, then got a really nasty surprise when that changed.

But what's really scarey is the lone star tick. If it bites you, you can become allergic to the protein in meat. No more steak, burgers, anything. You have to give it all up.


I have a coworker who got bit by one of those lone star tics. Good news - With treatment (by a doc who knows their stuff), it is possible to reverse the allergy to meat. It took him over a year, but he can eat beef again without grabbing an epi-pen.
Also, it's only an allergy to mammal type meat (beef, pork, venison, bison, etc). Poultry and Fish are still ok for people who develop the allergy.
BBb Tuba with 4 Rotors - TE-2110 (Ask me anything about this tuba) + TE Rose Mouthpiece
I earn my living as an Electrical Engineer.
NCSUSousa
3 valves
3 valves
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:55 am
Location: Probably goofing off at work - in Chapel Hill, NC

Re: Plastic vs. Metal mouthpieces

Postby joh_tuba » Sun May 20, 2018 11:00 pm

The Kelly 18 is a better mouthpiece than the metal version it is intended to emulate.

I remain unconvinced that the material makes a lick of difference beyond allergies and grippy-ness on the face.
joh_tuba
4 valves
4 valves
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 11:34 pm

Previous

Return to TubeNet

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], pecktime, proam and 12 guests