.
- TheHatTuba
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1150
- Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 6:00 pm
- Location: Desert
- NDSPTuba
- 3 valves

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 8:02 pm
- Location: DFW, TX
- Contact:
Re: Size comparison: Miraphone 190 vs. MW Fafner?
Don't know from actual side by side viewing, but my impression from viewing photos of the 190 next to other tubas and actually holding and playing a Fafner, is that the 190 is physically bigger. That the 190 has a bigger diameter bell and the throat size is larger. The Fafner is a tall tuba with a reasonably sizeable set of outer bows and bell ( they are definitely smaller than my 2000 Pro, though ). I'd call it a tall 5/4. I get the impression from the photos that the 190 is a wider ( ie bigger outer bows and bell ) tuba than the Fafner and almost as tall if not equally tall. Closer to a 6/4 than the Fafner. Again this is just my opinion based on cobbled together unrelated info.
Kalison 2000 Pro
G&W Taku
G&W Taku
- ZNC Dandy
- 4 valves

- Posts: 742
- Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:59 pm
Re: Size comparison: Miraphone 190 vs. MW Fafner?
Never had the pleasure of the company of a Miraphone 190, but I would CERTAINLY love to spend some time with one! I have spent a good bit of time with a Fafner. I'm not a small guy, and the Fafner be BIG 