I think a decent amount of the output really is that Eb, so it would be interesting to get a pointer to the evidence against that. To my ear ... I'm not real good at picking out partials, but I am 1) pretty sure I hear not only the strong 3rd partial Bb, but also a decent higher Eb and a G in there. And it seems to me that without that, you won't hear Eb - no way the wad of higher 13th etc. partials off a Bb open horn are going to add up to an Eb an octave below the staff.NCSUSousa wrote:From experience, I know that when someone plays a false tone EEb, I hear that EEb.
I have read (physics research by others, see previous posts on this board) that the open bugle tuba is not amplifying that low EEb very well, if at all. I would expect that some of the lower overtones (2-5) are similarly unamplified.
The higher overtones carrying the note (as far as my ear/brain is concerned) is my logical conclusion.
Where we know the fundamental is practically missing and inferred from harmonics is the `real' pedal note, i.e. BBb on the BBb tuba we've been talking about. It isn't there because (as diagrammed here) thanks to the bell's effect raising the frequency of the higher partials, the lowest resonance of the instrument isn't in the series, it's considerably lower. So the pedal note at the bottom of the series isn't really there, but the horn supports its overtones. Meanwhile, that lowest resonance ... I can't find any reference that says exactly where it ends up, but looks coincidentally close to an octave below our false tone.


