Why a BBflat tuba????

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

MaryAnn wrote:They all argued that what I said just couldn't possibly be true.
Of course, I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that the effect may be more a matter of the particular instrument than the basic open-bugle pitch. Horns have less design variability than tubas, and F is a lot farther from Bb than is C, of course.

But the proof of the pudding is in the tasting, not the recipe. You have observed something that you know is true but can't explain. I have heard an example where the blend between C tuba and Bb trombones was as good as anyone could hope for (the CSO low brass recording). What explains the divergent data points? I don't believe it can be laid at the door of Bb versus C in a general sense. There are too many countering examples. Thus, examples don't help much, even when they are a Martin Handcraft Bb tuba or a York C.

And I also challenged the notion that this is the result of some specific action or lack of action on the part of manufacturers. The accusation was made that they don't consider the overtones of the instrument, otherwise the instruments might be quite different than current models, and I disputed that. They may not consider them quantitatively, which would require knowing a lot that we don't know, but they do consider them qualitatively during R&D. Maybe sometimes they don't, and maybe they get lucky or the instrument they produce doesn't sell well and it fades into well-deserved obscurity. Or, maybe their objective isn't blend with trombones at all but something else. Or, maybe the craftsman has a tin ear. But the statement was made that manufacturers don't consider it, and I asked what they actually might do to consider it (unanswered).

I offered the observation that manufacturers might optimize a tuba for the use of an average amount of valve tubing, or attempt to even out the sound of the instrument even with the use of various valve combinations, such that a C tuba playing a Bb may produce overtones that blend better with trombones than a Bb tuba optimized for Ab. Then, I was told that it's not about good or bad, even though it was offered in defense of a particular (and presumably favorable) decision.

Question: Is the taper of a C tuba with the first valve branch in play so specifically a C tuba taper that it is by nature different from all Bb tubas played on the open bugle? I believe the answer is no. It is more likely yes, however, with horns, given that it takes a lot of additional tubing to turn a Bb horn into an F horn.

I'm really curious, and trying to goad Mitch, who obviously knows something useful, into clearly explaining it well enough to address the challenges.

Rick "adopting a standard confrontational academic approach with someone who demonstrates academic credentials in support of his statements" Denney
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Post by MaryAnn »

Well, not answering your question but throwing more charcoal on the fire.

Those same horn people castigate players who use the Bb side of the horn in the "usual F horn range" (my lower half of the octave) because "the F horn sound is much better than the Bb horn sound." BUT then when I say it does sound different when played with a higher note, they nay-say.

It all comes down to one of my larger pet peeves, which is people who operate out of belief instead of critical thinking. We could get going on education again?

Could it be that a similarly-designed CC tuba could be brighter than its BBb counterpart, makeing it blend better with the inherently-bright trombones? IS a CC tuba a more-or-less one-whole-step smaller instrument, overall, than a BBb tuba? I've been told that an F tuba is no way a scale model of a CC tuba, and that is why it doesn't "play like" a smaller version of a CC tuba.

MA
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

This is mostly a

Image

in a

Image

in my own opinion
User avatar
Lew
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: Annville, PA

Post by Lew »

Chuck(G) wrote:This is mostly a

Image

in a

Image

in my own opinion
My point exactly! Maybe I was too obtuse.
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

topchrisher wrote:
Mark wrote:Either you are in tune or you are not.
Nope. There are degrees of being "in tune," just as there are degrees of being "in tempo." "In tune" all depends on who is playing with you, and in what range they are playing, and the tendencies of the instruments in those places. It also depends on where you sit in the harmony and whether or not your ensemble is skilled enough to compensate for the fact that it should not play with equal temperament. One note played on one instrument by one player with no surrounding notes is never in tune.
Good observation -- but this doesn't have anything to do with the key of the instrument -- it applies universally. So I don't think you should have started with the word "nope", as your reply was to a post objecting to the notion that one key of tuba is not able to play in tune with other keyed instruments. Your post essentially supports this position, imo.

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Image
In A
Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Chuck(G) wrote:This is mostly a tempest in a teapot
Good heavens! If we had to restrict our discussions to topics that had any importance whatsoever, Tubenet would have to fold up from lack of interest.

Rick "who prefers Mr. Bug's Pontiac, though" Denney
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Lew wrote: My point exactly! Maybe I was too obtuse.
Image
Image :) :) :)
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Of course, all this *supposes* that the pitches in question remain constant, which they do not. 'A' could have been anywhere from 420 - 457, depending on what, where, and when, which kind of makes this WHOLE discussion moot....
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Tubaguy56
bugler
bugler
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:09 am

Post by Tubaguy56 »

Has anybody taken into consideration that if you have two horns of the same bore size (lets say .787) that a .787 on a BBb horn will be less conical than a .787 on a C horn? This would allow for overall better tone quality and more free blowing, given that the instrument, mouthpiece, and player were all the same. Also, nowadays tradition plays a big part of what horns we have to play, I went to IU this past winter to audition for Dan Perantoni, and he said he wouldn't take me unless I actually went out and bought a C horn, seeing as I went in on my BBb Mira 186.
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

Not quite.
The "Mensur" (German word for the way the tube diameter varies over the length of a horn) does not depend on the bore.
(Which I understand to be the diameter of the leadpipe entering the first valve). Given the same size of mouthpiece receiver and valve set, it depends on the length of the leadpipe to figure out how conical it´ll be.

I presume that manufacturers will try to use the same parts on as many types of horns as possible. This would mean that in order to produce different pitches, the ratio of length of an individual tube vs. overall length of the horn will change.
(10 yrd horn with 1 yrd leadpipe vs. 8 yrd horn with SAME leadpipe, for instance)
I also can imagine the same bells and (some) main bows used both on BBb and CC tubas, the difference being mainly the slide- and leadpipe lengths (plus maybe some branches).
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Tubaguy56 wrote:Has anybody taken into consideration that if you have two horns of the same bore size (lets say .787) that a .787 on a BBb horn will be less conical than a .787 on a C horn? This would allow for overall better tone quality and more free blowing, given that the instrument, mouthpiece, and player were all the same. Also, nowadays tradition plays a big part of what horns we have to play, I went to IU this past winter to audition for Dan Perantoni, and he said he wouldn't take me unless I actually went out and bought a C horn, seeing as I went in on my BBb Mira 186.
That has been mentioned (by me) on several occasions, and maybe once even in this thread or the similar thread from the same time to which this was the reversed question.

Furthermore, that faster taper is concentrated in a relatively short section of the main bugle. The first five feet or so of both the Bb and C Miraphones are the same, as is the last three feet or so of bell flare. So the faster taper occurs between a diameter of less than an inch to about 3.something inches. That 10 feet of bugle on the Bb is only 8 feet long on the C.

But I don't think you can say for sure which model (the Bb or C Miraphone 186) has the "better" taper design. There is nothing to indicate that a faster taper makes anything particularly better or even more free-blowing. But there is lots of experience to indicate that instruments with faster tapers are more likely to have intonation issues, though that experience is not related to the Miraphone. The taper design surely has an effect on the overtones produced and also on the intonation characteristics of the instrument, but there are lots of ways to adjust the taper here and there to offset other changes. Were it not so, conversions would be impossible rather than just difficult.

As to Parantoni's requirements, I suspect that is a test of commitment as much as anything, and someone of his stature can reasonably expect to fill his studio with only the most committed students. No performance student should expect to get through college without being at least competent on all tubas, and those who have difficulty in changing from one to the other maybe should consider whether they really should be pursuing that line. All the great musicians I've met seem to be able to make such transitions fairly easily.

Rick "not a great musician" Denney
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Post by MaryAnn »

Personally, I think even "middle ground" musicians such as myself can make these transitions fairly easily. However, the ability to play different types of instruments is only one of the many that are required to be a "great" musician. I think often the pure athletic ability is ignored; the musical ability is sometimes ignored when great athletic ability is present, too. One needs all, plus the requisite slavery to the instrument for however long it takes.

So: what are the "types of abilities" that are needed to make a great musician? I've touched on a few....adaptability to different instruments; athletic ability; "musical" ability. What else?

MA
User avatar
Lew
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: Annville, PA

Post by Lew »

Is this thread still going? It seems that a lot of people are very analytical about this. As a qualitative social researcher my answer is, because I like the BBb horns that I have. They are fun to play and look cool. I especially like my King (Bill Bell) 1291 rotary, Conn 40K, Distin, and King 2341.
User avatar
dmmorris
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:05 am
Location: From far away as Jupiter sulfur mines, way down by the methane sea.

Post by dmmorris »

Lew wrote: because I like the BBb horns that I have. They are fun to play and look cool.
This answer works for me also!

More Plumbing ~ Cooler looks!
beta 14??..........OK!

Mid 70's B&S Tuba
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

dmmorris wrote:More Plumbing ~ Cooler looks!
Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Tubaguy56
bugler
bugler
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:09 am

Post by Tubaguy56 »

if we're getting into how the horns look, I really like short FAT horns, but mostly fat, like, super wide bore.
User avatar
adam0408
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:58 am
Location: In the back row, playing wrong notes.

Post by adam0408 »

does it really matter what key of horn the common band rep was written for? Sure, there are some tunes that have passages that lie a little better on a Bb horn, and some that incidentally lie better on a CC horn. However, this is really a very small issue, since most music in the brass band catalogue has difficult parts that are scalar-based.

If you think about it, you are simply playing a different scale when you play the CC tuba. For example, you may have a four note, sixteenth based figure to play that starts on the note f just below the staff. On Bb you will be playing this as an F scale. If you play this on a CC tuba, you will be playing it as an Eb scale (relative to the Bb fingerings), which is only slightly less convenient. I hope that makes sense.

What the C does is simply make some scales easier to play and some scales harder. The difference evens out in the end. Speaking as someone who plays a CC on band literature, its not a big deal at all. The only time I really have problems is in the Eb scale, becuase I have to play those nasty 2&3 combinations that my fingers sometimes don't like. However, it is getting easier with practice.

My conclusion: I am with the guys that say "play what sounds good"

Joel "CC becuase the horn sounds better for me" Adams
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

I agree completely, but you have to admit that owning a BBb, CC, rotary F, tenor tuba, euphonium, AND cimbasso would show a lot of commitment... :shock:
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Bob1062 wrote:
windshieldbug wrote:I agree completely, but you have to admit that owning a BBb, CC, rotary F, tenor tuba, euphonium, AND cimbasso would show a lot of commitment... :shock:

I wanna make a joke about being committed (mentally), but sadly nothing comes to mind.
Why do you think we play the tuba? Because
Bob1062 wrote:sadly nothing comes to mind.
Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Post Reply