Why a BBflat tuba????

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Rick Denney wrote:In the end, though, you still have not persuaded me that Bb instruments are necessarily better for band, or that C instruments are necessarily better for orchestra, just because of the relationship to the open bugle, in producing "blend". That was your first thesis, was it not?
In fact, jump up an octave, and in the ochestra you find Bb trombones. They READ untransposed bass clef, but they are still in Bb

Jump up another octave, and you find the trumpets. Bb was chosen as an "easier" key to master, the Bb trumpet being really a long Bb cornet, which descended directly from the C/Bb/A/G cornopean. There, a step difference has a discernable change in length/bore ratio, which I can confirm, actually having been paid to play Bb and C trumpets and cornets (it's a long, and not very interesting story). These ARE harder instruments for an amateur to master.

But the "commonness" of the Bb cornet seems to have followed it to the band, and there rubbed off on the BBb tuba as guilt by association. No one that I know of asserts that C trombones should be used in a symphonic setting. I did, indeed, use a CC tuba with the symphony, but I think that was FAR MORE a matter of finding the right sound, blend, and the ABILITY to change all of that on a dime if the conductor asked.
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Mitch
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 253
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:29 am
Location: Chicago

Post by Mitch »

Rick Denney wrote: In the end, though, you still have not persuaded me that Bb instruments are necessarily better for band, or that C instruments are necessarily better for orchestra, just because of the relationship to the open bugle, in producing "blend". That was your first thesis, was it not?
No, it was not. Nevermind. :roll:
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

And in the end, we will probably have to agree to disagree on this one, keeping in mind that for the majority of American school programs, the instructional literature is for BBb tuba, not CC tuba. This tradition will probably stay with us for another century or so unless something as much as a leap forward comes along as the tuba was over the serpent and ophicliede. This being said, acknowledging that the basic design of all brass instruments, save the institutionalisation in the UK of Blaikley's compensating system, has basically been the same for roughly 175 years, since the invention of valves in the 1st third of the 19th century, and with the inherent shortcomings known and described for just a few years shy of almost as long.

So the answer to "Why a BBb tuba?" is the circular answer, "Because I do," which is another way of saying what the first page of posts to this thread do.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Mitch wrote:No, it was not. Nevermind. :roll:
Rather than shrug your eyes, look back to your explanation to see where you weren't clear. Everyone seems to have missed your point, now several times. Maybe we are just mired in the topic of the thread.

As Richard Feynmann said, if you can't explain it in plain English, you probably don't understand it yourself.

Strong words, yes, and probably not justified by what you understand. But one reason we have these discussions over issues nobody really cares about is to make sure we share our understanding. The "nevermind" response therefore gets my goat. It reminds me of the "whatever" I get from teenagers who won't explain themselves, either.

In each of my resonses, I have tried to restate your point to make sure I understand it. You have not corrected me, just told me I missed the point.

Rick "whatever" Denney
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Post by MaryAnn »

Reminds me of a similar horn list discussion a couple years ago.

I was playing 2nd horn on an early classical piece, one that was written for "horn in X" but I don't remember what the X was.
In particular, I noticed that when I was in octaves with the 1st horn, it blended considerably better if I used the Bb horn in a range (below concert middle C) where normally one would use the F horn. The 1st horn, with his higher note, was playing on the Bb side of the horn.

I posted about this to the horn list, noting how much better it sounded if I also used Bb horn, and tried to make arguments about the overtone series being different for the note if I played it on F horn as opposed to playing it on Bb horn. Now I would argue about the tapers I guess.

Anyhow, list response was along the lines of that note on the F horn being flat due to its position in the harmonic series, and that I must be hearing an intonation issue. (As if I were too stupid to bend the flat note up to pitch.)

They all argued that what I said just couldn't possibly be true.
No one, even the engineers on the list, came up with why this could be so, and also no one made the effort to try the experiment of playing in octaves with the lower person switching between the Bb and the F horns.

So I left them to stew in it, and I continue to play my lower half of octaves in that kind of music on the Bb horn, knowing that what I hear is what I hear. Put another way, the sound of the lower note on the F side of the horn, is darker than the sound of the same pitch played on the Bb side of the horn. I haven't sat down and figured it out, but it seems like the same pitch on the F side uses more tubing than when played on the Bb side, because of the relative position in the harmonic series. Innate flatness or sharpness has nothing to do with it; beatless octaves are beatless octaves.

MA, who realizes this has nothing to do with BBb tubas.
User avatar
Lew
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: Annville, PA

Post by Lew »

Why a BBb? You might as well ask why a duck?:

Image

Hammer: ...You're a peach, boy. Now, here is a little peninsula, and, eh, here is a viaduct leading over to the mainland.

Chico: Why a duck?

Hammer: I'm alright, how are you? I say, here is a little peninsula, and here is a viaduct leading over to the mainland.

Chico: Alright, why a duck?

Hammer: (pause) I'm not playing "Ask Me Another," I say that's a viaduct.

Chico: Alright! Why a duck? Why that...why a duck? Why a no chicken?

Hammer: Well, I don't know why a no chicken; I'm a stranger here myself. All I know is that it's a viaduct. You try to cross over there a chicken and you'll find out why a duck.

Chico: When I go someplace I just...

Hammer: (interrupts) It's...It's deep water, that's why a duck. It's deep water.

Chico: That's why a duck...

Hammer: Look...look, suppose you were out horseback riding and you came to that stream and you wanted to ford over...You couldn't make it, it's too deep!

Chico: Well, why do you want with a Ford if you gotta horse?

Hammer: Well, I'm sorry the matter ever came up. All I know is that it's a viaduct.

Chico: Now look, alright, I catch ona why a horse, why a chicken, why a this, why a that...I no catch ona why a duck.

Hammer: I was only fooling...I was only fooling. They're gonna build a tunnel there in the morning. Now is that clear to you?

Chico: Yes, everything excepta why a duck.

Hammer: Well, that's fine...then we can go ahead with this thing. Now look...I'm gonna take you down and show you our cemetery. I've got a waiting list of fifty people down at that cemetery just dying to get in it, but I like you.

Chico: Yeah, you're my friend.

Hammer: I like you, and I'm gonna shove you in ahead of all of 'em.

Chico: I know you like me.

Hammer: I'm gonna see that you get a steady position.

Chico: Atsa good.

Hammer: And if I can arrange it, it'll be horizontal...Now, remember, when the auction starts, if somebody says a hundred dollars?

Chico: I say two hundred.

Hammer: That's grand. Now if somebody says two hundred?

Chico: I say three hundred.

Hammer: That's great! Now, you know how to get down there?

Chico: No, I'm a stranger...

Hammer: (interrupting) Now look...now look, you go down there, down that narrow path there...until you come to the...that little jungle there, you see it? Where those thatched palms are...and there's a little clearing there...a little clearing with a wire fence around it. You see that wire fence there?

Chico: Alright...why a fence?

Hammer: Oh no! We're not gonna go all through that again!
User avatar
Donn
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5977
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Seattle, ☯

Post by Donn »

MaryAnn wrote:They all argued that what I said just couldn't possibly be true.
No one, even the engineers on the list, came up with why this could be so, and also no one made the effort to try the experiment of playing in octaves with the lower person switching between the Bb and the F horns.
I think that just proves that you want to go to the tuba players for your engineering analysis.

The last time this came up here, though, Haugan was saying that the Eb and Bb tubas sound better together than the sum of the parts, because their different harmonics for the same note reinforce each other. Should be true albeit to lesser extent for different octaves. Blend in the unobtrusive sense would be the other side of the coin.

For Bb vs C, fewer notes count for this issue, like B,C below staff, F#,G, B,C, etc. on up.

(Disclaimer: not an engineer.)
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Chico wrote:That's why a duck...
Somebody rang!?
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

Chuck(G) wrote:But should a college freshman music major dump his otherwise very nice BBb for a CC because he'll need a "serious" tuba for school?
I haven't read this whole thread, and frankly, I'm not going to bother, but it just occurred to me...

Can a tuba actually ever be "serious"??

:wink:
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

MaryAnn wrote:They all argued that what I said just couldn't possibly be true.
Of course, I'm not saying that at all. I'm saying that the effect may be more a matter of the particular instrument than the basic open-bugle pitch. Horns have less design variability than tubas, and F is a lot farther from Bb than is C, of course.

But the proof of the pudding is in the tasting, not the recipe. You have observed something that you know is true but can't explain. I have heard an example where the blend between C tuba and Bb trombones was as good as anyone could hope for (the CSO low brass recording). What explains the divergent data points? I don't believe it can be laid at the door of Bb versus C in a general sense. There are too many countering examples. Thus, examples don't help much, even when they are a Martin Handcraft Bb tuba or a York C.

And I also challenged the notion that this is the result of some specific action or lack of action on the part of manufacturers. The accusation was made that they don't consider the overtones of the instrument, otherwise the instruments might be quite different than current models, and I disputed that. They may not consider them quantitatively, which would require knowing a lot that we don't know, but they do consider them qualitatively during R&D. Maybe sometimes they don't, and maybe they get lucky or the instrument they produce doesn't sell well and it fades into well-deserved obscurity. Or, maybe their objective isn't blend with trombones at all but something else. Or, maybe the craftsman has a tin ear. But the statement was made that manufacturers don't consider it, and I asked what they actually might do to consider it (unanswered).

I offered the observation that manufacturers might optimize a tuba for the use of an average amount of valve tubing, or attempt to even out the sound of the instrument even with the use of various valve combinations, such that a C tuba playing a Bb may produce overtones that blend better with trombones than a Bb tuba optimized for Ab. Then, I was told that it's not about good or bad, even though it was offered in defense of a particular (and presumably favorable) decision.

Question: Is the taper of a C tuba with the first valve branch in play so specifically a C tuba taper that it is by nature different from all Bb tubas played on the open bugle? I believe the answer is no. It is more likely yes, however, with horns, given that it takes a lot of additional tubing to turn a Bb horn into an F horn.

I'm really curious, and trying to goad Mitch, who obviously knows something useful, into clearly explaining it well enough to address the challenges.

Rick "adopting a standard confrontational academic approach with someone who demonstrates academic credentials in support of his statements" Denney
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Post by MaryAnn »

Well, not answering your question but throwing more charcoal on the fire.

Those same horn people castigate players who use the Bb side of the horn in the "usual F horn range" (my lower half of the octave) because "the F horn sound is much better than the Bb horn sound." BUT then when I say it does sound different when played with a higher note, they nay-say.

It all comes down to one of my larger pet peeves, which is people who operate out of belief instead of critical thinking. We could get going on education again?

Could it be that a similarly-designed CC tuba could be brighter than its BBb counterpart, makeing it blend better with the inherently-bright trombones? IS a CC tuba a more-or-less one-whole-step smaller instrument, overall, than a BBb tuba? I've been told that an F tuba is no way a scale model of a CC tuba, and that is why it doesn't "play like" a smaller version of a CC tuba.

MA
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

This is mostly a

Image

in a

Image

in my own opinion
User avatar
Lew
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: Annville, PA

Post by Lew »

Chuck(G) wrote:This is mostly a

Image

in a

Image

in my own opinion
My point exactly! Maybe I was too obtuse.
User avatar
Steve Inman
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 804
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:48 am

Post by Steve Inman »

topchrisher wrote:
Mark wrote:Either you are in tune or you are not.
Nope. There are degrees of being "in tune," just as there are degrees of being "in tempo." "In tune" all depends on who is playing with you, and in what range they are playing, and the tendencies of the instruments in those places. It also depends on where you sit in the harmony and whether or not your ensemble is skilled enough to compensate for the fact that it should not play with equal temperament. One note played on one instrument by one player with no surrounding notes is never in tune.
Good observation -- but this doesn't have anything to do with the key of the instrument -- it applies universally. So I don't think you should have started with the word "nope", as your reply was to a post objecting to the notion that one key of tuba is not able to play in tune with other keyed instruments. Your post essentially supports this position, imo.

Cheers,
Steve Inman
Yamaha YEB-381 Eb
Conn 56J CC
Willson-Marzan CC Solo Model
Kokomo Chamber Brass
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Image
In A
Image
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Chuck(G) wrote:This is mostly a tempest in a teapot
Good heavens! If we had to restrict our discussions to topics that had any importance whatsoever, Tubenet would have to fold up from lack of interest.

Rick "who prefers Mr. Bug's Pontiac, though" Denney
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Lew wrote: My point exactly! Maybe I was too obtuse.
Image
Image :) :) :)
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

Of course, all this *supposes* that the pitches in question remain constant, which they do not. 'A' could have been anywhere from 420 - 457, depending on what, where, and when, which kind of makes this WHOLE discussion moot....
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Tubaguy56
bugler
bugler
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:09 am

Post by Tubaguy56 »

Has anybody taken into consideration that if you have two horns of the same bore size (lets say .787) that a .787 on a BBb horn will be less conical than a .787 on a C horn? This would allow for overall better tone quality and more free blowing, given that the instrument, mouthpiece, and player were all the same. Also, nowadays tradition plays a big part of what horns we have to play, I went to IU this past winter to audition for Dan Perantoni, and he said he wouldn't take me unless I actually went out and bought a C horn, seeing as I went in on my BBb Mira 186.
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

Not quite.
The "Mensur" (German word for the way the tube diameter varies over the length of a horn) does not depend on the bore.
(Which I understand to be the diameter of the leadpipe entering the first valve). Given the same size of mouthpiece receiver and valve set, it depends on the length of the leadpipe to figure out how conical it´ll be.

I presume that manufacturers will try to use the same parts on as many types of horns as possible. This would mean that in order to produce different pitches, the ratio of length of an individual tube vs. overall length of the horn will change.
(10 yrd horn with 1 yrd leadpipe vs. 8 yrd horn with SAME leadpipe, for instance)
I also can imagine the same bells and (some) main bows used both on BBb and CC tubas, the difference being mainly the slide- and leadpipe lengths (plus maybe some branches).
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
Post Reply