The problem with this line of thinking is that it assumes a bowser has a wall beyond which it will limit the player and before which it won't. A bowser isn't that way at all. Bowsers make everything harder, even the easy stuff.DP wrote:how many crappy tubas are ever used to the point where the tuba is what's limiting the player?
You once told a story of Tony Clements trying out a famous eye-candy tuba, pieces of which are now awaiting rebirth in Baltimore. He declared the tuba unplayable after a few minutes, but your point at the time was that Tony still sounded great on it.
So, Tony was good enough to sound great (according to your ears) on a bowser, but how much better might he have been on a great tuba? Could the bowser have been limiting him in small ways that would impose enough technical requirements to overcome them that it would take the edge off Tony's music-making skills?
The story of Jacobs auditioning well at Curtis with a valve tied down isn't persuasive here. He was 15, and the teachers were able to look past the instrument at the potential of the player. That's not the charge of evaluators for a pro-gig audition. For them, the player's choice of instrument and what he does with it is part of what they are evaluating.
Rick "a dope" Denney

