What would you consider the Best ORCHESTRAL F Tuba?

The bulk of the musical talk
bigbear19
bugler
bugler
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Lubbock TX

What would you consider the Best ORCHESTRAL F Tuba?

Post by bigbear19 »

I am a college student starting to browse for an F tuba. I play on a 6/4 pt-7 and I really wanna know what you guys think the best ORCHESTRAL F tuba would be.

Thanks

Andy Smith
quinterbourne
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 772
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Post by quinterbourne »

Yamaha 822?
User avatar
Douglas
Low Brass Teacher
Low Brass Teacher
Posts: 326
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 3:05 pm
Location: Huntsville, Alabama
Contact:

Post by Douglas »

I play on a 6/4 Neptune (very similar to a PT-7) and I use a Miraphone 181 - 6 valve. But really it depends on the player more than the instrument. I've heard really good things about the big Yamaha 822 and the Miraphone 181 is a solid tuba.
Doug Black, D.M.A.
Assistant Professor of Music, Alabama A&M University
Eastman Tuba Artist
bigbear19
bugler
bugler
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Lubbock TX

Post by bigbear19 »

Still looking with my prof.
The orchestra is large enough to pull off Mahler 2 (130 member)
I play on a 6/4 pt-7 that's all i own. I am playing on a school owned 6 valve gold brass pt 16.
The repertoire would be anything that calls for BASS tuba. Especially for Auditions.
I want an F because a 6/4 cc isn't really an option for playing things like Mahler 1, Bydlo, Romeo and Juliet, High solo Rep., small chamber ensemble work. etc...

I really just want to know people's opinions on best LARGE ORCHESTRAL F tuba out there.


Thanks again for your input!!!
hugechunkofmetal
bugler
bugler
Posts: 87
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 9:35 pm

Post by hugechunkofmetal »

Mate everybody has different opinions, you need to get out there and try a few horns and see what works for you!

You already play a b&s, maybe try something by them first. They work very well for some people, and others just can't stand them.

Try Miraphone, try Melton, try every horn that you possibly can, and pick the best one for you!

Just because so and so plays on this doesn't mean it will work for you!
bigbear19
bugler
bugler
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Lubbock TX

Post by bigbear19 »

I know that I have to try out horns, I just wanna know what OTHER PEOPLES OPINIONS are.


Thanks again
Andy
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Post by GC »

The Rudolf Meinl F's are hard to beat.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
RyanSchultz
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 11:45 pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Fs

Post by RyanSchultz »

I would look at the new Mirafones (including the 181) and the big Yamaha (822).
__
Pacific Northwest Ballet Orchestra and Auburn Symphony Orchestra

University of Puget Sound
https://www.pugetsound.edu/directory/ryan-schultz
User avatar
LoyalTubist
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Arcadia, CA
Contact:

Post by LoyalTubist »

My likes:
-Big bore
-Good intonation
-Good low register (it might be an F, but it's still a tuba!)
________________________________________________________
You only have one chance to make a first impression. Don't blow it.
Dan Castillo
bugler
bugler
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:24 pm

Re: What would you consider the Best ORCHESTRAL F Tuba?

Post by Dan Castillo »

I'm not sure if there is such thing as an orchestral F. With C tubas, you tend to see a lot of the same horn in different orchestras. (PT-6, Nirschl, Gronitz) It seems with F tubas, there's a much greater variety. I've seen a lot of different brands and sizes. If you want something that puts out a lot of sound, you might try the Willson or Gronitz. A large B&S F might match your CC tuba a bit better though. How do you feel about the PT-16 you're using now?

I think with bass tubas there's a lot more room for personal choice since lots of times it's about playing solo lines (Mahler 1, Petrouchka, Bydlo, Sensemaya, etc) and not being the bottom of the orchestra.

What do I know though? I play Eb!!
User avatar
Steve Marcus
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1843
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:18 am
Location: Chicago area
Contact:

Post by Steve Marcus »

You might want to wait until the Alan Baer designed "Kodiak" F tuba is in production.
Steve Marcus
http://www.facebook.com/steve.marcus.88
Phi Mu Alpha Sinfonia
bigbear19
bugler
bugler
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: Lubbock TX

Post by bigbear19 »

Thanks once again for your input. I am looking for a bigger horn to fit in with the bigger horn i play now. I like the PT 16, however the lower register is very uneven and difficult. My professor has both the yamaha 822 and the PT 10 anniversary model. I was leaning towards trying the yamahammer more seriously than others, but I'm still not positive. I want the depth and roundness that i can get out of my pt7 but I want the lighter qualities and tone color changes of a smaller F. Once more thank you all for your input.

Andy
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

bigbear19 wrote:I want the depth and roundness that i can get out of my pt7 but I want the lighter qualities and tone color changes...
The tonal and weight gap between your massive PT-7 and any F is going to be absolutely huge. If it is specifically for large orchestra use, a 4/4 CC may be a better bet to fulfil your requirements as quoted above.

My experience was that the gap between my Neptune (similar in size to your PT-7) and my Melton Eb (which is bigger than most F) was too wide and I needed something in between - nicely filled by my PT-20 which is great for most of the kind of works on your earlier list.
Pete Link
bugler
bugler
Posts: 224
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:25 am
Location: Sendai, Japan

Post by Pete Link »

There certainly are some great models out there to choose from. I was fortunate enough to get ahold of a great Rudy 5/4 and have not looked back. The older B&S tubas I've tried are great too. The new JBL classics F from B&S is very impressive. It is pricy but so are the Rudy Fs.
The Firebird is a fantastic horn too. From what I understand the 181 Miraphone is being made wth the Firebird valve body now and has helped the pitch alot.
I am eager to try Alan's new Kodiak F as well. Also for your information Walter Nirschl will be coming out with acouple new rotary F tubas in the near future. He is working with a well known german player on these models. However, a new BBb is coming out first.
Having been through 6 F tubas myself in not so many years I'd say the most important thing to do is to take your time. Play everything you can get your hands on and see if you can get it right the first time unlike many of us. What works for some does not for others. You will know when you have gotten your hands on something special.

Good Luck!

Pete
Last edited by Pete Link on Sat May 05, 2007 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Post by cjk »

Meinl-Weston 45SLZ or 46SLZ. Big F tuba, but still sounds like an F tuba unlike the Yamaha 822. The 45SLZ/46SLZ also has a nice scale.

The Miraphone Firebird is a bit smaller, but still a fairly large F, and also very well in tune with itself.
tubeast
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:59 pm
Location: Buers, Austria

Post by tubeast »

To bloke:
Be welcome to try out MY horn. Slight intonation issues ? Maybe. Most of these will be MY fault, not the horn´s. 35 cents ? Never played THAT sharp on 2nd space C (except, maybe, on purpose) while in front of a tuner.

To the original poster:
check out the "Norwegian Star" Eb tuba. (the bigger one). Not that this matters that much, but I truly fell in love with THAT one last April in Frankfurt, Germany.
Hans
Melton 46 S
1903 or earlier GLIER Helicon, customized Hermuth MP
2009 WILLSON 6400 RZ5, customized GEWA 52 + Wessex "Chief"
MW HoJo 2011 FA, Wessex "Chief"
SFAtuba
bugler
bugler
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:11 pm
Location: Dallas, Tx

Post by SFAtuba »

Hi,

I really can't say enough good things about the Gronitz PF 125 F tuba. If you are looking into the Yamaha 822 then you should give this tuba a serious look because it has a low range that easily rivals the 822, and in my opinion it has a better sound more like that of a German rotary F. If you have any questions about the way one plays or anything like that just pm me and I'll try to answer your questions.

Cheers,
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

The complaints I've heard about the Yamaha 822 is that the sound is vanilla and difficult to manipulate to suit specific applications. And that it sounds like a small C instead of a large F.

The Willson has the second fault but not the first. Lovely instrument. But it still sounds like a contrabass.

If you want an F tuba that can penetrate a large ensemble and still sound like an F tuba, then it will take a bit different sound concept than you are used to with the PT-7. Instead of an enveloping sound, you'll be searching for clarity and power.

One reason the B&S tubas became the near-standard for F tubas used in orchestras was that it had the clarity and power to penetrate a large ensemble and still sound like a bass tuba rather than a contrabass tuba. And they have an excellent scale, until you get down in that low C range.

I have learned not to be so afraid of the low C on a rotary F. It has some of the same blow issues as the low F on my Holton. You have to really find the resonance in the note and then feed it carefully--trying to shove too much air into it will kill it rather than reinforce it. It's like making a good low F on a trombone.

Since that first B&S (the Symphonie), several makers have tried to work from that concept and improve the low register, including B&S. The Miraphone 181 seems to me cut from that mold, though it's still a very different instrument. It has an excellent bottom end compared to older rotary F's, but at the expense of some of that lovely bass tubas color. All the big rotary F's are trying to find that balance.

But if you want a tuba that plays and sounds like a small contrabass, the Willson is the pick of the litter in my view. For a clear bass tuba sound that can stand up to a large ensemble, the older B&S design still seems the best to my ears, but it requires care and feeding. The Miraphone, newer B&S models, Meinl-Weston 45 and 46 models, and so on, fall in between.

I now play a Yamaha 621 F and an old B&S Symphonie. The Yamaha is too small for large ensembles, which is why I got the B&S.

Rick "who didn't used to like B&S F tubas, either" Denney
Getzeng50s
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 2:13 pm
Location: Boston

Post by Getzeng50s »

Miraphone firebird
Santo Domingo Festival Orchestra
Orchestra of Indian Hill
Cape Ann Symphony
USTuba08
bugler
bugler
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:31 pm

Post by USTuba08 »

From now on, I plan on using a Miraphone 184 CC for an F tuba :shock: I'm tired of playing out of tune F tubas
Post Reply