Bob1062?

MaryAnn · Post by **MaryAnn** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:31 pm

Doc wrote:
Bob1062 wrote:
So, I should get payed. Right??

Hey, little buddy, it'll be okay... Right MaryAnn?

The Skipper

Right!

MaryAnn

windshieldbug · Post by **windshieldbug** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:33 pm

MaryAnn wrote:
Doc wrote:Hey, little buddy, it'll be okay... Right MaryAnn?

The Skipper
Right!

MaryAnn

I can see another avatar change coming...

MaryAnn · Post by **MaryAnn** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:00 pm

MaryAnn wrote:
Doc wrote:
Bob1062 wrote:
So, I should get payed. Right??

Hey, little buddy, it'll be okay... Right MaryAnn?

The Skipper
Right!

MaryAnn

You got one you can send me? It would be an amusing avatar.

MA

windshieldbug · Post by **windshieldbug** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 6:06 pm

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 9:01 pm

Doc wrote:You'll be happy to know, Rob, that pommes are commonly served with any style schnitzel in Deutschland. Even more common for us commoners. Spaetzle is certainly available, and it fantastic, especially kaesespaetzle!

Wasn't all this started because someone thought himself a little too Spaetzle?

WakinAZ · Post by **WakinAZ** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:19 pm

I do admire the Gentle Giant's enthusiasm - he is all about blowing on these horns, and that's what this site is about.

Yes, I posted this is the other thread that devolved into a BashBobFest, but I really wanted to use this image more than once.

Eric "not anti-Bob, even if I do skip most of his voluminous posts" L.

TMurphy · Post by **TMurphy** » Thu Jul 26, 2007 9:26 am

It's been six years since I studied German. Thanks for the refresher course, guys!

Tim "Die Kase sind schlect...wo ist die Bad??" Murphy

Mark · Post by **Mark** » Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:33 pm

Bob1062 wrote:
ed wrote:
tofu wrote:Bob -

The reality is most of these guys on here love you and would surely miss you if you didn't post and give them something to yack about.
"Most". Please note that s/he said "most".
Why? Am I this guy-
viewtopic.php?p=167917&highlight=#167917

Since you are responding to ed, are you implying that you also post under the name Lee Jacobs?

LoyalTubist · Post by **LoyalTubist** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:08 pm

I'm bumping this so we can all join in.

I am irritated right now because I sent him a private message in which I told him how I felt about something he wrote. And then he posted it publicly. Then he told me to lighten up.

This isn't to say that I am angry. I'm not mad. It's not worth it. I consider the source.

LoyalTubist · Post by **LoyalTubist** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:40 pm

Did you hear me say I am not angry?

I am merely irritated that you made a PM public. There's a cardinal forum rule that you never do that.

Rick Denney · Post by **Rick Denney** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:10 pm

LoyalTubist wrote:Did you hear me say I am not angry?

I am merely irritated that you made a PM public. There's a cardinal forum rule that you never do that.

Bill, I'm going to defend Bob (some more) on this one, and since you've made a public fight, I'm going to let you have it a little bit, in public. If I received a PM that attacked me, I'd be strongly tempted to publish it, especially if the sender mentioned it in a taunt in a public post. You should not send what you don't want publicly published, especially when what you don't want publicly seen is the use of rudeness to attack rudeness.

You cannot have it both ways. You should know from your experience in the Far East that politeness starts with the small things. If you had a beef with Bob, you should have taken it all the way private or just let it go.

There are NO cardinal rules on Tubenet, except for those expressed plainly by the owner. He has done so only rarely, which should be an indication of his views on the matter.

If you don't want to be stung by an ant, don't kick the anthill. Especially over the issue of hijacking your thread, which was not yours to hijack. That is also a long-established plain principle of online forums--the original poster of a thread does not own the thread. You can disagree with the direction it goes, and state your disagreement, but your ideas have to stand up to the same scrutiny as all the others.

I respectfully suggest that you let this go.

Rick "now, Bob, my advice you is to also let it go" Denney

TMurphy · Post by **TMurphy** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:16 pm

Rick Denney wrote:
LoyalTubist wrote:Did you hear me say I am not angry?

I am merely irritated that you made a PM public. There's a cardinal forum rule that you never do that.
Bill, I'm going to defend Bob (some more) on this one, and since you've made a public fight, I'm going to let you have it a little bit, in public. If I received a PM that attacked me, I'd be strongly tempted to publish it, especially if the sender mentioned it in a taunt in a public post. You should not send what you don't want publicly published, especially when what you don't want publicly seen is the use of rudeness to attack rudeness.

You cannot have it both ways. You should know from your experience in the Far East that politeness starts with the small things. If you had a beef with Bob, you should have taken it all the way private or just let it go.

There are NO cardinal rules on Tubenet, except for those expressed plainly by the owner. He has done so only rarely, which should be an indication of his views on the matter.

If you don't want to be stung by an ant, don't kick the anthill. Especially over the issue of hijacking your thread, which was not yours to hijack. That is also a long-established plain principle of online forums--the original poster of a thread does not own the thread. You can disagree with the direction it goes, and state your disagreement, but your ideas have to stand up to the same scrutiny as all the others.

I respectfully suggest that you let this go.

Rick "now, Bob, my advice you is to also let it go" Denney

Thank you, Rick, for stating what I tried to state in the other thread. You said much better than I ever could.

WakinAZ · Post by **WakinAZ** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:16 pm

Lee Jacobs · Post by **Lee Jacobs** » Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:14 pm

How did I get dragged into this?

Albertibass · Post by **Albertibass** » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:45 am

i dont know how you dont know that you kinda quoted lee. You did didnt you? or am i missing something?

Albertibass · Post by **Albertibass** » Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:06 am

Bob1062 wrote:
ed wrote:
tofu wrote:Bob -

The reality is most of these guys on here love you and would surely miss you if you didn't post and give them something to yack about.
"Most". Please note that s/he said "most".

Why? Am I this guy-
viewtopic.php?p=167917&highlight=#167917

alright, i guess what i left out was that this post confused me. what did you mean here?

WakinAZ · Post by **WakinAZ** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:13 am

Eric "who likes to use this image to gently poke fun at Bob" L.

SplatterTone · Post by **SplatterTone** » Mon Aug 20, 2007 11:02 pm

That Dalyan Prague at wwbw would have my interest if I didn't already have my limit of tubas.

WakinAZ · Post by **WakinAZ** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:31 pm

RE: the MW EEb - You have bass tubas to fall back on if you need to play high. Why settle for a one horn solution, when you can have a bass tuba and a contrabass?

Eric "who thinks Bob will have to start posting under the name 'Ed' if he buys anything but a contrabass" L.

don't be afraid of a real tuba, big man

iiipopes · Post by **iiipopes** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:00 pm

OK, Bob, you won't buy the ones for sale. You continue to waffle among choices that may or may not actually suit your needs/desires/ensembles. Upon the civil attempts to engage in progressive dialog to help you focus on your goal, you go off on tangents. I'm left with having to say it:

13

186

TubeNet

Bob1062?

Didn't he just request this?