Investing in a Larger horn

The bulk of the musical talk
Jarrad-Bittner
bugler
bugler
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:38 am

Investing in a Larger horn

Post by Jarrad-Bittner »

Jarrad Bittner
Last edited by Jarrad-Bittner on Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jarrad Bittner
User avatar
WoodSheddin
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 9:44 pm
Location: On the bike
Contact:

Post by WoodSheddin »

A PT-6 is not THAT big.
sean chisham
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

A PT-6 would be considered in the 5/4 category, just as you are describing. One reason for these later M-W creations is to compete with the PT-6.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by SplatterTone »

There is a fair amount of info in this recent thread.
viewtopic.php?t=20508
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
Jarrad-Bittner
bugler
bugler
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 1:38 am

Post by Jarrad-Bittner »

Thanks guys.

Sorry, I heard that the Pt-6 was a very large horn like the HB-50. I have never seen one up close.

Thanks for your input.
Jarrad Bittner
User avatar
pwhitaker
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 449
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:58 pm
Location: Springvale, Maine

1291 Redux

Post by pwhitaker »

I recently bought a 1291 5V BBb and it must be just like the CC version because I agree with the above post. If I had this horn 30 years ago I would have never fooled around with the Eb's for quintet and solo work. This horn does it all.
MISERICORDE, n.
A dagger which in mediaeval warfare was used by the foot soldier to remind an unhorsed knight that he was mortal.
- Devil's Dictionary - Ambrose Bierce
james
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Washington, DC

um

Post by james »

Not true. There have been more than a few players on 6/4 horns offered big jobs in recent memory....I could compile a list if needed, but I know how much you hate that. I do agree that clarity is a MAJOR issue in these auditions.
Tubaguy56
bugler
bugler
Posts: 183
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 12:09 am

Post by Tubaguy56 »

Alan Baer? Gronitz PCK? NY?

The other thing about Pt6's is you have to try out the rotor model, if you try out the rotor and the piston side by side the difference is also incredible. I put my money in for a Gronitz PCM them, I do love them gronitz's
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

If you don't want to go too much larger, you could always consider the PT-20. Although classified 4/4, with its 19" bell (the same diameter at the PT-6) it can certainly produce a big sound. I have found it stands up surprisingly well for low register punch, even compared with the Thor!

I have used it for a couple of large symphony orchestra gigs with good comments.

Jonathan "who has found the PT-20 a great all purpose tuba"
Last edited by Wyvern on Tue Apr 03, 2007 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Post by cjk »

bloke wrote:
Doc wrote:And the verdict....???
' no verdict... The PCK simply isn't a "6/4" tuba.

(13)

I would be interested in a list of people who auditioned with Nirschl 6/4, M-W 2165/2265/Baer, cut-down-or-factory Holton 345, HB York model, PT-7P, (or even) the new Yamaha York model, and were recently offered living-wage full-time full-season orchestra jobs.

bloke "Which '6/4' models did I leave off the list?...OK, add the RM 5/4, just to put one NON-designated 6/4 (but BIG) rotary tuba on the list."

In the pics posted recently of the LA tubafest or whatever, the Baer sure did look PCK sized to me.
joebob
bugler
bugler
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 9:51 pm

Post by joebob »

Bloke - I know that Mike Roylance (Boston) and Randy Montgomery (Milwaukee) won their jobs on Nirshl Yorks. I know that Craig Knox was using a Nirshl York at some auditions though I'm not sure what he used at Pittsburgh. Steve Campbell was using a VMI 6/4 Culbertson at some auditions though again I'm not sure if he used it at any of the auditions he won (he also has a PT6). I'm sure all four of those guys could play with clarity on just about any horn. Anyone else know about people using 6/4 horns at auditions successfully?
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Doc wrote:PCK is NOT 6/4? Hmm... At least a BAT?
His Blokeness is stirring the pot by making the distinction in size between a PCK and the standard Yorkophones. (By the way, Joe, I would put the Rudy 5/4 in the PCK category--it is not quite as fat as a Yorkophone). And he puts the PT-6 in the smaller category, too.

I wonder why so many pros who already have gigs are using the big tubas. I don't think it's just a fad. I know that Mike Sanders did so because the instrument was much easier to play (he has said so on Tubenet), compared to his Alex. His sound was noticeably different on the YB--rounder, sweeter, and more present. The Alex was more direct--more of a match for the trombones and less an individual voice. He has never suffered from any lack of clarity on the Yorkbrunner.

But I've heard lots of players who did.

Rick "thinking more of efficiency as the years add up" Denney
james
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:58 pm
Location: Washington, DC

ok

Post by james »

ok Bloke...here it is.

Boston-Nirschl York
Milwaukee-Nirschl York
Pittsburgh-Nirschl York
Cleveland-Yorkbrunner
Naples-Nirschl York
Toledo-MW2165 (unless a recent change was made)

Then you have:
Philly, Colorado, and Minnesota-PT6/PT6p
Ft. Worth, National, New York-Gronitz PCK (all Alan Baer)

*Edit* Despite the above information, which I presented for mere fact at the request of Bloke, I believe the PT6, Gronitz PCK, and Willson are more than big enough, if not too big, for most college students.

-james
Last edited by james on Wed Apr 04, 2007 1:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by SplatterTone »

First Baptist, Tulsa - Miraphone 191 or Allora 186. On Easter, maybe a ratty Conn 14j to play a bass trombone part. (Yeehaa!) And that's cause I ain't going to spend no big bucks to get high rollin' e-flat.

Jes' tools. Nothin' but tools. It's an aggravation Harbor Freight don't make tubas.
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
User avatar
cambrook
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 8:50 pm
Location: Perth, Australia

Post by cambrook »

I haven't followed this thread in detail, but I'd just like to back up what DP and others have said. Unless you play in a very large ensemble there will be more times than you'd imagine where a 6/4 of any description will be simply more tuba than is appropriate. I know you can play soft on a big tuba, and in some settings the extra prescence of these horns is wonderful - they can be the times that remind us all why we play tuba. However, it can be enormously frustrating to be continually "getting the hand" from the conductor because he's hearing more prescence that he expects or wants. Nothing will lose you respect faster than always being "too big/loud/whatever".

Of course if you win the lottery you should consider buying one of everything to cover all possibilities :) - but in my opinion you have to be playing a lot of big gigs to warrant a 6/4 over a 5/4.
Cameron Brook
West Australian Symphony Orchestra
www.waso.com.au
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

Another factor to consider in the purchase of a 6/4 tuba is the conductor's sound concept in the bands, or orchestras you regularly play. In my experience some conductors 'love' the sound of a big tuba, while others prefer a more subdued tuba within the ensemble. I find that to be a BIG factor on in if I take my 6/4, or 4/4 (in one orchestra I play I know the conductor likes the sound of my Neptune as I asked him, while in another I have been asked to use my smaller tuba).

I would suggest if possible borrow or trial a 6/4 with your main ensemble before purchase and tell the conductor what you are doing and ask for their opinion of the sound - they will appreciate you as a musician for doing so, and you will avoid the frustration of forever getting the hand afterwards.
User avatar
tubacdk
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post by tubacdk »

cjk wrote:
bloke wrote:' no verdict... The PCK simply isn't a "6/4" tuba.
In the pics posted recently of the LA tubafest or whatever, the Baer sure did look PCK sized to me.
Playing and hearing the Baer and the Yorkies back-to-back, the Baer is clearly the smaller horn. I think it's a large 5/4 - bigger than a PT-6, HB-6. If I owned a Baer and was playing with a large orchestra, I know I'd feel the need for a 4/4 CC at times but never the need for anything bigger than the Baer. I really liked its balance of clarity and breadth.

-ck
pierso20
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1101
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:33 pm
Contact:

Post by pierso20 »

Going back to the original post......

why is it your profs suggested that you needed a bigger horn than the 1291???

I am sure it was suggested for a reason....or perhaps not. Either way, if you have the money to blow and want to..then theres no stopping you. BUT if you are going to make an investment, it is something you need to put more thought into.

It sounds as if you are keeping the miraphone and then getting another larger horn...if this is the case, do you have a smaller "solo horn" yet? Uusually, the step is from a 4/4cc to an F...and then if the occasion calls for it, grab a 6/4...but there isn't always a reason to have one.

IN FACT, my professor recently played with the CSO and a 6/4 horn was required. He had to borrow one because he doesn't have one. He rarely finds a need to use it...so my question for you is.....do you really need a 6/4 horn?? (to get a 5/4 horn while having a 1291 would be silly). Or do you WANT a 6/4 horn??

Believe me..if I had lots of money or I could be GIVEN a 6/4 horn...I WOULD FOR SURE do it..who doesn't love playing a huge tuba...but sometimes it isn't always practical.

And there's my rant....haha 8)
Brooke Pierson

Music Educator
Composer
Composer http://www.brookepierson.com" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Post by GC »

The PT-7 is close to the size of the HB-50.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Post by Wyvern »

tubacdk wrote:Playing and hearing the Baer and the Yorkies back-to-back, the Baer is clearly the smaller horn.
That was exactly my thought when I tried one. Definitely smaller than the 2165 (which I tried back to back with it), or my Neptune. But an excellent tuba with good full tone.
Post Reply