the elephant wrote:lgb&dtuba wrote: . . . the usual Chinese bashing from those who haven't ever played one . . .
???
The "usual bashing" on this site usually comes from teachers here with direct experience in aiding students in locating horns, or from people who are looking for horns for themselves as backup instruments at a decent price.
With all due respect, elephant, more than a small percentage of negative comments about Chinese horns come from people who, by their own admission, either have never played the horn (notice lgb&dtuba asked specifically about the TE-1150L, not Chinese horns in general), or whose impression is based on having bought/played a Chinese horn 3, 4, or more years ago. Yes, 3-4 years ago, even the best Chinese horns could reasonably be characterized as "junk," however, since you yourselve acknowledge that Chinese horns are improving at an alarming rate, I would submit, opinions based on 3-4 year old experiences are badly outdated and do not accurately reflect the current quality of the better Chinese-made horns.
I have played about a dozen different Tuba Exchange euphs—both non-comp and comp—from 3 different shipments, and play-tested them against a Yamaha 321 (silver), King 2280 (silver), and my comp Besson New Standard as well as a tuner. While I cannot speak for
every TE1300, the ones I have played have been
at least the equal of the 321 and the 2280 in terms of build quality and intonation, and would choose the TE1300 over either of the established models; and based on my side-by-side test of the TE comp with my New Standard, were my New Standard to be stolen or damaged to the extent that the cost to repair would exceed the cost of the TE1150, I would not hesitate to replace it with at TE1150. Nevertheless, I would still play-test several of them side-by-side to find the best of the lot, just as I would were I in the market for a Besson, Yamaha, Sterling, Miraphone, Courtois, or any other brand.