Mac Users - Firefox Security vs. Safari
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
-
tofu
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1998
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: One toke over the line...
Mac Users - Firefox Security vs. Safari
Last edited by tofu on Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LoyalTubist
- 6 valves

- Posts: 2648
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:49 pm
- Location: Arcadia, CA
- Contact:
- jbaylies
- 5 valves

- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:35 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
- Contact:
Safari is much better in my eyes.BriceT wrote:firefox is much better

But I guess whoever made this video thinks otherwise.
-
sungfw
- 3 valves

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: RTP, nc
OK ... experiment time:
Autofill URL
In Safari:
1) Safari > Reset Safari > Reset
2) Type first few letters of a bookmarked item in Address Bar
Result?
In Firefox:
1) Firefox > Preferences > Privacy > Private Data > Settings
2) Select all (Browsing History, Download History, Saved Form Information, Cache, Cookies, Saved Passwords, Authenticated Sessions)
3) Click OK
4) Click "Clear Now"
5) Type first few letters of a bookmarked item in Address Bar
Result?
Autofill URL
In Safari:
1) Safari > Reset Safari > Reset
2) Type first few letters of a bookmarked item in Address Bar
Result?
In Firefox:
1) Firefox > Preferences > Privacy > Private Data > Settings
2) Select all (Browsing History, Download History, Saved Form Information, Cache, Cookies, Saved Passwords, Authenticated Sessions)
3) Click OK
4) Click "Clear Now"
5) Type first few letters of a bookmarked item in Address Bar
Result?
- MaryAnn
- Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak

- Posts: 3217
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am
My only worry about Firefox is that since it appears that "anyone" can update the code....that "anyone" might not have your, or my, best interests at heart.
But I still use it. It appears to load much faster than Safari on my dial-up, and that *matters* to me since I don't have all gol-darn DAY to wait for a page to load. On my webmail, Stoopid Safari just HAS to wait for ALL the dumb ADs to load before it will "take" my password and go on; Firefox doesn't care about the stoopid ADs and just ignores them once I hit the enter button after my password.
MA
But I still use it. It appears to load much faster than Safari on my dial-up, and that *matters* to me since I don't have all gol-darn DAY to wait for a page to load. On my webmail, Stoopid Safari just HAS to wait for ALL the dumb ADs to load before it will "take" my password and go on; Firefox doesn't care about the stoopid ADs and just ignores them once I hit the enter button after my password.
MA
-
sungfw
- 3 valves

- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: RTP, nc
More than likely, FF is loading pages from the cache and updating in the background rather than loading in realtime. (If you're using a dial-up accelerator, it's absolutely loading from the cache.) You can check by clearing private data, which will clear the cache, before loading a page: if the load time is longer than usual, FF is loading from the cache.MaryAnn wrote:But I still use it. It appears to load much faster than Safari on my dial-up, and that *matters* to me since I don't have all gol-darn DAY to wait for a page to load.
Hmm ... I don't get that behaviour. What version of OS X and Safari are you using? [BTW, you can interrupt loading of any page by hitting Command-. (period).]On my webmail, Stoopid Safari just HAS to wait for ALL the dumb ADs to load before it will "take" my password and go on; Firefox doesn't care about the stoopid ADs and just ignores them once I hit the enter button after my password.

