Finale Training

Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Post Reply
clagar777
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:17 am
Location: Texas

Finale Training

Post by clagar777 »

My school does not offer a course on Finale software training. What options do I have that aren't online courses elsewhere?
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by SplatterTone »

The cuss words. Don't forget the cuss words. You'll need them.
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11514
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

the elephant wrote:maybe a hand-holding session might actually be what you are after
... or a trunk-holding session. Why fix dirty old horns? Maybe you could branch out! :shock:
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
User avatar
Carroll
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:25 am
Location: Cookeville, TN (USA)

Post by Carroll »

I agree %100 with the notion that the best way is to jump in! I took a Finale course while in grad school. Unfortunately, the class met at the same time as marching band (which paid my assistantship) so I NEVER attended the class. The instructor would give me the assignments and I would figure them out. I ended up doing all of the copy work for the marching band and building some serious Finale chops in the process.

Pick a project and learn what you need for that project. Then pick another...
djwesp
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:01 pm

Re: Finale Training

Post by djwesp »

clagar777 wrote:My school does not offer a course on Finale software training. What options do I have that aren't online courses elsewhere?

You could just use Sibelius and be done quicker, and then spend the rest of the time drinking beer so dark and thick it sticks to the glass like syrup.

Image


Seriously, when used correctly, Sibelius gives you a quality product. The playback on Sibelius, especially the drum plugins are incredible and the entry is much easier.

I could rant on, but i'm not in the mood to get blasted by the 13 squad. :P
djwesp
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:01 pm

Post by djwesp »

****Removed because of ambiguity****
Last edited by djwesp on Fri Feb 22, 2008 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Carroll
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:25 am
Location: Cookeville, TN (USA)

Post by Carroll »

djwesp wrote:
EuphoniumPlayer87 wrote:I've heard that Sibelius is much more "user-friendly" but I think the reason Finale is used more in the business is the ability to control basically every aspect of what the final product looks like.

Partially agree. However, the Sibelius product looks far from UNprofessional. It is still very presentable. I highly doubt many of the tubenet faithful, even most software input program users will ever be in that situation.

You can perform duties adequately on both. I'd venture to guess most Finale users do so because of Finale notebook and Finale requirements at their institution of education. Several schools now have distanced themselves away from Finale in the last few years because of its shotgun in a knife fight attitude.
I use it because the publisher of the composer I do copy work for prefers Finale. And I do expect to be able to control every aspect of the finale (Finale) output.
djwesp
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:01 pm

Post by djwesp »

Carroll wrote:I use it because the publisher of the composer I do copy work for prefers Finale. And I do expect to be able to control every aspect of the finale (Finale) output.
Maybe you misunderstood what exactly I was trying (poorly) to say.


In a PROFESSIONAL situation Finale is ALWAYS given the edge. BUT, most of us will NEVER been in that situation.
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by SplatterTone »

ability to control basically every aspect of what the final product looks like.
For the casual user, this translates into: You must control every aspect because Finale is too stupid to do it for you. But I was permanently and forever jaded by acquiring Finale at Version 2.1 when it came on two floppies for Windows 3.1. It was a necessity to save at least every 5 minutes to keep from losing work.

Things have certainly improved, but the one thing that still drops my jaw is the continued need for those arcane ALT-number sequences. (at least as of Finale 2006)

I think my most accurate analogy for Finale is Alice Tinker on The Vicar of Dibley. Decently good looking, but sure is stupid.
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
User avatar
Carroll
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 12:25 am
Location: Cookeville, TN (USA)

Post by Carroll »

djwesp wrote:
Carroll wrote:I use it because the publisher of the composer I do copy work for prefers Finale. And I do expect to be able to control every aspect of the finale (Finale) output.
Maybe you misunderstood what exactly I was trying (poorly) to say.


In a PROFESSIONAL situation Finale is ALWAYS given the edge. BUT, most of us will NEVER been in that situation.
And perhaps I was not clear, either. I will agree that Finale has capabilities beyond what most casual users need (but so does Sibelius). At the end of the day, try some downloads and find what works for you... then BUY it!
tbn.al
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3004
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Atlanta, Ga

Post by tbn.al »

If you are going to be engraving for comercial interests, you have no choice but to use Finale. Which IMHO is reason enough not to get into that ratrace. I just got up from a 2 hour session with Sibelius and I am still in a relatively good mood. For what I do, editing and arranging for a church orchestra, I wouldn't go back to Finale. I left Finale for the Sibelius scanning feature but stay because it's is so intuitive. My stuff looks exactly like the Finale stuff I buy, but the program is so much easier on my blood pressure. Composition is a cakewalk compared to Finale, although I never get to do much of that anyway.
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
Post Reply