schlepporello wrote:Should they not have been metric? What about the threads on the ball pinions themselves? Are they standard as well?
There are several possibilities here.
One is that the ball-and-socket linkages were actually added over here. This was certainly true of my Sanders-labeled Cerveny from the early 80's, where the linkage conversion had been done by the importer.
Another possibility is that Cerveny still has a bunch of SAE-threading equipment, and therefore still thread things using what is now U.S. customary units. After WWII (and sometimes long after the war), European countries migrated to metric dimension systems. But the machine tools they had predated these conversions, and indeed many countries could only get their machine tools second-hand, or from U.S. and British sources. Thus, there are many examples of metric countries using threads in English units. One that I can think of is used in bicycles. Italian-threaded bottom bracket bearings use a metric diameter (36mm) and British threads (24 threads/inch). This is a leftover from the early 50's. Another example is that bicycle chains still have a half-inch pitch, even though nearly nobody in the U.S. makes them any more.
Given that many ex-Second World countries have not updated much of their equipment or design since the immediate post-war period, it is possible that Cerveny is still standardized on threading in inches.
Those are two possibilities, but I'll bet the real reason is that the supplier of the parts primarily makes stuff for the U.S. hobby market. Those ball joints I took off that Cerveny were made by Du-Bro (though it wasn't their more robust stuff that I used to replace it). That's why I suspect that the importer installed it, but it could be that the factory buys parts from the same source, and I'll bet that's the case now.
Rick "who has found that ex-German eastern-bloc photo equipment is largely metric, but ex-American/British European bicycle stuff is still a mix" Denney