Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
cjk
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1915
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

Post by cjk »

UncleBeer wrote:Off topic: Anyone have a link to info on the Kelly 50? I've never heard of it, and no mention of it on the Kelly site.
It is (was?) a copy of a PT-50. I do not know if is a regular production piece. If you search tubenet for "KT50", you'll get a few hits, one or two from Mr. Kelly himself.
Last edited by cjk on Tue Aug 26, 2008 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
TubaBobH
bugler
bugler
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:26 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

Post by TubaBobH »

I bought a Bach 12 a few months ago and FINALLY have had a chance to use it in a contrabass tuba (rotary Mirafone, I THINK it's a 187). Works fine for me, and I generally love my 18.
A Bach 18 is also one of my favorite mouthpieces, and I was toying with the idea of trying a 12, thinking that it might perhaps have all of the characteristic of an 18 that I like, while maybe adding a little more heft in the lower register due to it's larger inner diameter. Since my King is a relatively small bore tuba, I am thinking that a Bach 7 might be overkill for me. How would you compare playing a Bach 12 to a Bach 18?
Bob Horuff
King 1241UB
MF-2B / Conn 120s / Kelly 18

If I should ever die, God forbid, let this be my epitaph:
The only proof he needed for the existence of God was music."
[Kurt Vonnegut]
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Re: Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

Post by SplatterTone »

The biggest difference is that the rim on the 12 is a little fatter and a little flatter than the 18. It plays entirely different than the 18. I like the 12, and I like Bloke's characterization of it as a good glove box mouthpiece. I think the Kelly 18 is like a Bach 12 rim applied to an 18 size.
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
User avatar
Todd S. Malicoate
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2378
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:12 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK

Re: Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

Post by Todd S. Malicoate »

SplatterTone wrote:The biggest difference is that the rim on the 12 is a little fatter and a little flatter than the 18.
Bob1062 wrote:The rim on my Bach 12 is noticeably thinner than the rim on my Bach 18.
Well, for crying out loud, which is it?

Is the rim on the 12 "fatter" or "thinner" that the rim of the 18?
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10427
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Isn't a Kelly 18 closer to a Bach 12 than a Bach 18?

Post by Dan Schultz »

UncleBeer wrote:Off topic: Anyone have a link to info on the Kelly 50? I've never heard of it, and no mention of it on the Kelly site.
As some posters have already mentioned... the KT-50 is/was a Lexan copy of the PT-50. A few of them were made off of a prototype mold and sold for $50 each.... quite a bit more money that the other Kelly mouthpieces. Apparently there wasn't much interest in the MP so a production injection tool was not built. I don't have a clue how many were actually made. I think Jim Kelly used to be a TubeNet sponsor. Maybe he'll chime in here. A friend of mine who owns an Internet music business gave me this one in return for some repair work I did for him a while back.

I use mine A LOT. It's a good MP for me. Of course... I thought the LAST MP I had before this one was the best, too! :shock: :wink:
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
Post Reply