What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by imperialbari »

Kevin Hendrick wrote:
The Jackson wrote:
imperialbari wrote:If CC is better than BBb, wouldn’t Db be even better?

Klaus
As sound an argument as that may be, I don't advocate and won't support the name of any parachuting criminal in my tuba playing.
... even though a Db might fit in a Mini Cooper? :wink:
Would that cause a barrel shaped bell?
User avatar
Kevin Hendrick
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Location: Location

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Kevin Hendrick »

imperialbari wrote:
Kevin Hendrick wrote:
The Jackson wrote:As sound an argument as that may be, I don't advocate and won't support the name of any parachuting criminal in my tuba playing.
... even though a Db might fit in a Mini Cooper? :wink:
Would that cause a barrel shaped bell?
Sounds wright to me ... :oops:
"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
Norm Pearson
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:13 am

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Norm Pearson »

joebob wrote:As has already been mentioned in this thread, the CC tuba is slightly shorter in tubing length than the BB flat tuba and this often translates to a slightly better response (there are many exceptions to this I'm sure).
I played a hand made Fafner a few weeks ago that was as responsive and easy to play as my Baer 6450/2 hand made FWIW

Norm Pearson
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by bort »

Norm Pearson wrote:
joebob wrote:As has already been mentioned in this thread, the CC tuba is slightly shorter in tubing length than the BB flat tuba and this often translates to a slightly better response (there are many exceptions to this I'm sure).
I played a hand made Fafner a few weeks ago that was as responsive and easy to play as my Baer 6450/2 hand made FWIW

Norm Pearson
1) Top-quality tubas are top-quality tubas, regardless of key.
2) Top-quality players are top-quality players, regardless of tuba.
User avatar
tokuno
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 270
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:51 am

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by tokuno »

bort wrote: 2) Top-quality players are top-quality players, regardless of tuba.
Uh oh, gulp. Not sure I like the opposite corollary, but pretty sure I resemble it. :(

To paraphrase Lincoln:
Better to be silent on my BBb and be thought a fool than to play out and remove all doubt . . . :oops:
User avatar
Alex C
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:34 am
Location: Cybertexas

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Alex C »

imperialbari wrote:If CC is better than BBb, wouldn’t Db be even better?

Klaus
No, D is better.*
.
.
.
.
.
.
*e.g. The "Bobo D tuba"
City Intonation Inspector - Dallas Texas
"Holding the Bordognian Fabric of the Universe together through better pitch, one note at a time."

Practicing results in increased atmospheric CO2 thus causing global warming.
User avatar
Kevin Hendrick
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Location: Location

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Kevin Hendrick »

Alex C wrote:
imperialbari wrote:If CC is better than BBb, wouldn’t Db be even better?

Klaus
No, D is better.*
.
.
.
.
.
.
*e.g. The "Bobo D tuba"
Just to throw yet another option (a.k.a. "monkey wrench" :wink: ) into the mix, I would think there'd be occasions where a large-bore AAb would be useful (I know an Ab tenor would be nice to have for orchestral use -- seems like the AAb contrabass would also) ... :tuba:
"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
eupher61
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2790
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:37 pm

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by eupher61 »

The ultimate argument against a CC preference:

How many C trombones do you see running around? If'n it's good enough for the slushpumpers, it's good enough for me. IF it's a good tuba.
User avatar
Lew
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1700
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
Location: Annville, PA

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Lew »

imperialbari wrote:If CC is better than BBb, wouldn’t Db be even better?

Klaus
I know you're being sarcastic, but that's not the point. I believe that people are saying that playing in sharp keys is easier on CC, not because it is two ft shorter, but because you make less use of third and fourth valve combinations. The pinky and ring finger are just not as strong as the other fingers.

I agree that a professional should have the same facility on a tuba in any key, and that these differences should not matter, in which case the choice of key of tuba should be based on the specific horn that allows them to more readily achieve the tone quality they prefer and facilitates intonation. I am just saying that I can understand why some people would say that most orchestral pieces sit easier on a CC than on a BBb. But, I never play CC, although I have tried many of them, and almost never play with an orchestra, so it is moot for me. I find that having a 4/4 BBb, a 6/4 BBb, and and Eb are more than enough for what I need. I could probably do all my playing (wind ensemble, concert band, British (style) brass band, brass quintet) on the 4/4 BBb, but what fun would that be. Of course having a couple of sousaphones to use for marching, or a helicon just to confuse people is fun too.
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by imperialbari »

The Db suggestion was more directed towards those suggesting the advantage being its better response due to the shorter tubing.

Db tubas have been used in Danish bands. I never saw one, that I was aware of, but my first brass tutor, which was already very old, when I started in 1960, had fingering tables for Db tubas with various valve configurations.

Klaus
tubamonster
bugler
bugler
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 8:00 pm
Location: Texas

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by tubamonster »

Wonderful, another BBb vs. CC argument.
Who cares? This is just something to keep those of us on the Tubenet going as someone previously posted.
As for fingerings: learning CC because the fingerings are "easier" is a waste of time because you will still run into complicated fingerings. Besides, we only have 3-6 things to press down. Think about how many things a woodwind player has to press down (we have other challenges).

tubamonster
tubamonster
Miraphone 191 5v with SS Kellyberg
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by Wyvern »

imperialbari wrote:The Db suggestion was more directed towards those suggesting the advantage being its better response due to the shorter tubing.
If one follows that argument then Eb is better, then F yet better still, but it is all what one wants sound and response wise.

My experience is that CC is a good balance between the BBb sound and Eb response.
BavarianFanfare
bugler
bugler
Posts: 68
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: What is the real deal between BBb and CC?

Post by BavarianFanfare »

Dear TubeNet Community:

It is widely known that in Germany, where the tuba was invented, that BB-Flat & F Tubas are the instruments of choice in their professional orchestras. Does this mean that tubists in other countries outside the U.S. are not as accomplished on their instruments? Personally, I believe that it is a matter of personal preference as to which key a tubist plays or performs on. If a tubist can win an orchestra job with either a CC or BB-Flat, does it really matter which one?
In closing, I like tubas in BB-Flat, CC, F, & E-Flat. If my teacher believed that I sounded better on a particular keyed tuba, that should be the one I should seriously consider focusing my attention on most. I have spoken in depth with my teacher about transitioning to a CC, but will not do so until I have overcome a few issues in my playing. He has never discouraged me from moving to CC, or staying on BB-Flat only. My teacher is a professional player, and whom I respect both personally & professionally, so his insight is very, very, important to me. I embrace both BB-Flat & CC, and do not believe that BB-Flat Tubas are just for amateurs or children! Just my perspective and my humble opinion.

Sincerely & Respectfully,

Bavarian Fanfare
Post Reply