I learned Apple-Alt-Drag this evening! (had to go into a chatroom and ask

Windows distinguishes between "Minimize" (make the window go away, but leave the program running) and "Close" (end the program).TMurphy wrote: Unlike Windows, these are two seperate things on a Mac. Closing a window does not close the program, just that window of the program.
That's what the button with the line in it is for! Or doesn't Apple have a button like that?corbasse wrote:Yes, but if you click on the button with the cross in the left/right top corner of the window, Windows will close the application, whereas Apple will only close the window and leave the application running.
The reason why is so that, on a Mac, the app and the document are separate "entities" on the user end. You can close the last document of an application, and when you need to open another, you don't have to restart the application again.corbasse wrote:Yes, on a mac you also have three buttons doing basically the same as in Windows.
The only difference is, that as a Windows user, you click on the cross and the program is closed. On Mac it isn't. You *have* to close the application using apple-Q or the menu.
Still gets me confused, since I only use a mac at work, and I've only been there for a year...
(what am I still doing awake???)funkcicle wrote:thanks! That is indeed helpful.. I've been using the menu to manually close apps.
Why should you have to do that?tuba4sissies wrote:I personally have no problem with windows. I just run Adware occasionally when its running odd. And it finds crap and i quarentine it. that's all she wrote.
That statement holds no water. In fact, I'm not totally certain what that means. Owning a Mac blocks your opinions???tuba4sissies wrote:Eh? Well i foudn mac to be like AOL, they block a lot of your opinions, and dont let you get certain things.
The absolute soonest would be at MacWorld San Francisco in January, but I seriously doubt that we'll see a portable G5 for a while. It's a significant step up in power consumption and heat (although still not as draining as comparable Intel and AMD 64-bit chips), and IBM is still getting the power needs down to a level that's reasonable enough for portables.Jacob Morgan wrote:not to turn this into a tech thread, but is the g5 release soon?