Modern Ophicleide

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
djwesp
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1166
Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2004 11:01 pm

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by djwesp »

I hate to be "that" guy.

Although listed as "ophicleide" these instruments ARE NOT ophicleide. The fundamental characteristics defining ophicleides are that they are conical and that they are KEYED.

The "modern ophicleide" although named as such is not an ophicleide. The root of the word ophicleide is even a direct construction of the words serpent and keys put together in Greek. The instruments shown are very close to, if not exactly the same as, a classification of tubas called "aufrecht wagner tuben" which literally translated is upright Wagner tubas (not to be confused with Wagner tubas, which have a much more open wrap, different key, and curved bell). Horns similar to these have been around for a very long time, and the innovation is very little.

... that being said, i'd love to have one of these to play with... wouldn't you guys? :-)
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by David Richoux »

There is a bit more explanation of the use of the term on their website - here. Since the instrument is designed to directly replace the Ophicleide tone quality with a valve instrument, it seems logical to call it a Valved Ophicleide. Similar horns were made in the late 1800s and were also called Valved Ophicleide.
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Wyvern »

I like it!

Pity no sound clips to hear it - that's what really matters - how it sounds.
Kyle Turner
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:53 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Kyle Turner »

Hello all.
I will be embarking on another recital tour with the Virtuoso Horn Duo, starting October 19th. I will be per forming 1 piece on the modern Ophicleide. I used this instrument at the Bard Music Festival with the American Symphony. The instrument was purchased by Leon Botstein, conductor of the ASO. As far as I know, I am the first person to play it in the U.S. It is pitched in F, and, for the most part, plays like one.
I am also launching a website, kyleturnertuba.com so look for that next week to see where I will be performing.
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by imperialbari »

David Richoux wrote:There is a bit more explanation of the use of the term on their website - here. Since the instrument is designed to directly replace the Ophicleide tone quality with a valve instrument, it seems logical to call it a Valved Ophicleide. Similar horns were made in the late 1800s and were also called Valved Ophicleide.
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Bob Kolada »

Looks like a stovepipe cimbasso to me! :D


Klaus, is that a sudrephone?
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by imperialbari »

My original source called it an anonymous valved ophicleide.

Klaus
User avatar
hbcrandy
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 653
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Baltimore, Maryland USA
Contact:

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by hbcrandy »

What is the fundamental pitch of these instruments?
Randy Harrison
Proprietor,
Harrison Brass
Baltimore, Maryland USA
http://www.harrisonbrass.com
Instructor of Applied Brass Performance
Maryland Conservatory of Music
Bel Air and Havre de Grace, Maryland USA
http://www.musicismagic.com
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by imperialbari »

The nominal fundamentals of the most common ophicleides were C or Bb, but at least some versions could descend a semitone lower. Pitch names for keyed instruments often are odd. You can have C flutes with a B-natural foot. C piccolos have D as their lowest note, and the very common Bb clarinet really is an Eb instrument with a D foot.

Klaus
User avatar
Tuba Guy
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: here...or there...depends on where I am....

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Tuba Guy »

I think the pitch naming convention for woodwinds (at least what seems to make sense) is that their C determines what pitch they are (soprano clarinets, their C is a concert Bb, alto/bari sax-C is Eb, etc). If I remember my clarinet playing days well enough, the way they determine which note is a C is when all 7 fingers are down (LH123/RH1234)
"We can avoid humanity's mistakes"
"Like the tuba!"
User avatar
imperialbari
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 7461
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:47 am

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by imperialbari »

Tuba Guy wrote:I think the pitch naming convention for woodwinds (at least what seems to make sense) is that their C determines what pitch they are (soprano clarinets, their C is a concert Bb, alto/bari sax-C is Eb, etc). If I remember my clarinet playing days well enough, the way they determine which note is a C is when all 7 fingers are down (LH123/RH1234)
I don’t disagree with you about the main idea. Only your suggested fingering gives a written F in the first register of the clarinet.

Klaus
User avatar
Tuba Guy
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 677
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: here...or there...depends on where I am....

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Tuba Guy »

That is true. This led me (in my mind, when I started transposing) to think about the Eb register of the clarinet and the Bb register...still how I think about it
"We can avoid humanity's mistakes"
"Like the tuba!"
User avatar
J.c. Sherman
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2116
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Cleveland
Contact:

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by J.c. Sherman »

A few things...

Klaus (sp?) your source is off; that photo is a Sudrephone. The giveaways are the wrap, Perinet valves, and - more importantly - the "mirliton" cylinder on the side of the bell throat. In fairness, without the mirliton, it's very similar.

Kyle: I'm curious; are you an ophicleidist? I'm interested in a comparison by a player with experience on both and the balance within an orchestra as well.

True 19th century Valved Ophicleides bear some resemblance to the Sudrephone pictured, the tight bottom bow, narrow flared bell, etc. They were originally three-valved (usually Vienna twin-pistons) instruments in F, basically with a modified crook and no holes. The Meucci article on Italian and Viennese Cimbassi and bass tubas is a must-read for this topic.

Proportionally, this looks like a Euphonium with a gentler taper - but that bell looks right off the euph mandrel, so I'm interested in how it sonically compares. I'd love to try it regardless - elegant instrument!

J.c.S.
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium, Cleveland State University
Principal Tuba, Firelands Symphony Orchestra
President, Variations in Brass
http://www.jcsherman.net
Kyle Turner
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 90
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:53 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Kyle Turner »

It's a very nice unique sound. I played it quite a bit this past Summer with the American Symphony. It does have some Euphonium qualities, but it is definitely a warmer sound. When I played out on it, the sound really carried. I got lots of positive feedback on it. I will be taking it with me on my recital tour in 2 weeks. Check out the details and more pictures of it on my web site. http://www.kyleturnertuba.com" target="_blank
User avatar
David Richoux
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 11:52 pm
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, mostly. Also Greater Seattle at times.

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by David Richoux »

hrender wrote:For those who wanted sound (althought these look like they might be "real" ophicleides):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUS-NJ8nSnI
For us poor souls who cannot remember YouTube ID sequences - how about giving the title of the clip along with the URL so we don't reopen "Ophicleide Summit in Berlin" for the eleventeenth time :?

By the way, one can actually easily embed a URL in its title by typing: Ophicleide Summit in Berlin or whatever text you want here, with or without spaces) and the forum software will do the rest.

Like this:

Code: Select all

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUS-NJ8nSnI]Ophicleide Summit in Berlin[/url]


which will look like this when submitted:
Ophicleide Summit in Berlin

This works well for really long URLs so you don't have to use TinyURL.com or similar places that might eventually expire.
User avatar
Wyvern
Wessex Tubas
Wessex Tubas
Posts: 5033
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Hampshire, England when not travelling around the world on Wessex business
Contact:

Re: Modern Ophicleide

Post by Wyvern »

David Richoux wrote:By the way, one can actually easily embed a URL in its title by typing: Ophicleide Summit in Berlin or whatever text you want here, with or without spaces) and the forum software will do the rest.

Like this:

Code: Select all

[url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUS-NJ8nSnI]Ophicleide Summit in Berlin[/url]
Thanks for explaining that! I have been wanting to embed hyperlinks like that in some of my posts, but did not know how :roll:
Post Reply