Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
jonesbrass
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Sanford, NC

Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by jonesbrass »

Okay, so all three of these BBb horns appear to be near carbon copies of each other. The Allora is the least expensive and made in China, the Cerveny is a little more expensive than the the Allora and is made in the Czech Republic, and the Miraphone is the all-time German classic.

Has anyone played and/or inspected each of these that can offer a comparison: tone, response, construction quality, etc.?

Many apologies if this has been discussed ad nauseum, but I couldn't find this comparison with the advanced search option.
Willson 3050S CC, Willson 3200S F, B&S PT-10, BMB 6/4 CC, 1922 Conn 86I
Gone but not forgotten:
Cerveny 681, Musica-Steyr F, Miraphone 188, Melton 45, Conn 2J, B&M 5520S CC, Shires Bass Trombone, Cerveny CFB-653-5IMX, St. Petersburg 202N
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by Bob Kolada »

I've never played the Cerveny and only played the Allora once. I still like the VMI 2103 better than all of them.
Chadtuba
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1005
Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:00 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by Chadtuba »

I owned the Allora for a couple of years and had the chance to do a side by side with the Miraphone. The Allora was a heavier gauge metal and didn't have the ring around the bell; outside of that they were almost identical in every physical way. Playing wise, the Allora had a couple of flat notes compared to the Miraphone but nothing that I wasn't able to work around with some slide pulling and alternate fingerings. If you are looking for a budget horn I would have no problem suggesting the Allora, nor would I hesitate to purchase one again if the price was right.
User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by SplatterTone »

I have one along with a Miraphone 191. The Allora has more back pressure (or rather, the 191 has almost no back pressure) making it a little easier to play. The bigger bore of the 191 along with the thin brass of the bell gives it a more harmonically expansive sound (and I don't mean a more bassy sound). The Allora has good intonation, very easy to play on pitch. I do not do slide pulling.

Based on the recordings I have made, I'd have to say the Allora has a little more punch-through even if the solo sound doesn't seem as "big." I might have gotten lucky and ended up with an especially good one, but mine runs in tune with the main tuning slide about 1/2 inch out and all other slides in. Based on mine, I wouldn't hesitate to recommend the horn.

Here are some sound samples from my church playing. No solo playing, but you can hear the horn in the context of a group which I suspect is probably how you are likely to use it.

Choir, organ and band. Not much to the tuba part. Pretty crummy, actually. Nothing but B flats for tuba for a while, but later there is enough to give you some idea of how it sounds in a group. Mouthpiece is a Kellyberg.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_15_ ... _cross.mp3

Here are a couple hymns where I put some muscle into it. The organ is a fifty-something rank Aeolian-Skinner. Audience is about 600 people. Choir about 70 people with microphones across the front of the group. Mouthpiece is probably a DEG Astro Nylon.
Bodacious opening hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn1.mp3
Mellower hymn with some attempt at sweet and pretty tuba playing.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn2.mp3

For comparison to the 191 and Astro Nylon.
The bodacious hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/hymn1.mp3
The choir and band (the shaky tempo at the beginning was not me)
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/river.mp3
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
Bignick1357
bugler
bugler
Posts: 66
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:12 pm

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by Bignick1357 »

I own a 5 valve CC Miraphone 186 and I play in my concert band at my school of 60, a youth orchestra of 80, another youth concert band of 120, all of which I am one on my part and I hold up all of those quite well. But I also do all of my Allstate and district auditons on which I got first chair in so it works for everything. I do live in maine so it wasn't terribly hard but still it shows you the virsatility of the Miraphone 186 :tuba:
Nick Allen
USM Music Ed Student Class of 2014
tubaman1019
bugler
bugler
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 7:01 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by tubaman1019 »

I've played on a miraphone 186 and I currently own a Cerveny 686. The Cerveny is a great horn. I used it in everything from playing solos to full orchestra. As far a playability, I find the Cerveny and the miraphone to be very alike. I would say the miraphone can pack just a bit more punch. I've heard myself in recordings with orchestras, and the cerveny does just fine. Only thing a don't like about the cerveny is that the brass is a bit thin and dents easily.

P.S.
I will be selling my Cerveny 686 pretty soon after I get my Miraphone 1292 likely around Mid Feb-March. Send me a message if interested.
Florida Grand Opera - Tuba/Cimbasso
Palm Beach Symphony - Tuba
DMA University of Miami '21
User avatar
jonesbrass
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 11:29 am
Location: Sanford, NC

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by jonesbrass »

tubaman1019 wrote:. . . As far a playability, I find the Cerveny and the miraphone to be very alike. . .
This is what I suspected. The three horns I listed are clearly copies of one another, although the Cerveny and Miraphone have a common Bohemian origin, I'm not sure which one came first.
Willson 3050S CC, Willson 3200S F, B&S PT-10, BMB 6/4 CC, 1922 Conn 86I
Gone but not forgotten:
Cerveny 681, Musica-Steyr F, Miraphone 188, Melton 45, Conn 2J, B&M 5520S CC, Shires Bass Trombone, Cerveny CFB-653-5IMX, St. Petersburg 202N
Norm in Bellevue
bugler
bugler
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 11:55 pm
Location: now in Helena, MT

Re: Allora AA186 vs. Cerveny 686 vs. Miraphone 186

Post by Norm in Bellevue »

SplatterTone wrote: Choir, organ and band. Not much to the tuba part. Pretty crummy, actually. Nothing but B flats for tuba for a while, but later there is enough to give you some idea of how it sounds in a group. Mouthpiece is a Kellyberg.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_15_ ... _cross.mp3

Here are a couple hymns where I put some muscle into it. The organ is a fifty-something rank Aeolian-Skinner. Audience is about 600 people. Choir about 70 people with microphones across the front of the group. Mouthpiece is probably a DEG Astro Nylon.
Bodacious opening hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn1.mp3
Mellower hymn with some attempt at sweet and pretty tuba playing.
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/10_25_09/hymn2.mp3

For comparison to the 191 and Astro Nylon.
The bodacious hymn
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/hymn1.mp3
The choir and band (the shaky tempo at the beginning was not me)
http://t-recs.net/mpegs/FBC/2009/11_22_09/river.mp3
Splatter Tone,

Thanks so much for these sound clips. As a Roman Catholic church musician, it's been so many years since I've heard these Protestant standards. And played on an Aeolian-Skinner no less! What a treat. And you and your 191 are keeping up with the 16' reed, too!
Miraphone 188
Parke Ofenloch
Continental Divide Tuba Society
Post Reply