Equipment implied by a piece

The bulk of the musical talk
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

I was handed a piece by one of the graduate conducting students at WVU that is for percussion ensemble with a small group of wind instruments. I leafed through the part and, due to the range, could tell that a bass tuba would be the best choice of equipment for this piece as most of my notes were in the Bb in the staff to the d above the staff range, with a few low notes involved (wouldn't be a tuba part w/o them right?). I could do this on my CC, but I think for the best overall tone quality and least wear on my chops (did I mention the piece is 30 minutes long, most of which I play in?) I should use a bass. To the real reason I'm posting. Anyone in the Morgantown, Pittsburgh, Charleston WV area's have a bass tuba they would be willing to allow me to rent for a few months?

Thanks and happy practicing,
Andrew
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by Bob Kolada »

What is the music and instrumentation like? A euphonium with a large mp could work.
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

I thought about it, I don't really know the instrumentation yet, as far as brass goes I think it's trumpet, horn, tuba, and if that's the case a euph might work, but I'll have to see. Thanks Bob.
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
User avatar
jamsav
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 12:25 pm
Location: stamford, ct
Contact:

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by jamsav »

down an octave ? maybe ?
http://www.westchestersymphonicwinds.org" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank" target="_blank"
King 2341-MAW valves, GW Taku, Sellmansberger Symphony
Conn USN 20k, PT-44
jon112780
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 541
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:52 am
Location: on my soapbox...

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by jon112780 »

What is the piece? Perhaps someone on TubeNet has played it...



Based on your info, you have a couple options:

1.- Get a hold of the score and a recording (if possible); then take the part down an octave (in spots) if you need too, if appropriate.

2.- Practice your high register on your current axe until the concert and show off your newfound 'mad skills'.

3.- See if it is actually playable 'as is' on euphonium/bass trombone and discuss it with the conductor. If you can convince him the part was 'mis-marked' or sounds better on another instrument, then your problem is solved.

4.- A bass tuba will be more flexible and help slot the upper notes, not help you play higher. Playing in the upper register on a horn you are less-than-confident-on during a performance is usually a bad idea.

Ask you applied lesson professor, usually it's the easiest way to get the best answer for this kind of situation!
Energizer Bunny arrested, charged with battery.
User avatar
The Jackson
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1652
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by The Jackson »

jon112780 wrote:Ask you applied lesson professor, usually it's the easiest way to get the best answer for this kind of situation!
↑↑↑ THIS. ↑↑↑

But, to offer another suggestion, why not try and contact the (assumed alive) composer of this work?
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by Bob Kolada »

bloke wrote:"yeah...and I walked to school 23 miles in the snow every day as well"
Carrying an F tuba? :D
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by windshieldbug »

Bob Kolada wrote:
bloke wrote:"yeah...and I walked to school 23 miles in the snow every day as well"
Carrying an F tuba? :D

Uphill both ways, half an hour before he went to bed, and when he got home his dad would kill him and dance about on his grave singing "hallelujah!" :wink:
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Tom
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1579
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:01 am

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by Tom »

I think it's kinda funny that you "decided" to play it on bass tuba but you don't have a bass tuba to play it on or have access to one through a teacher or other students.

To me, it is pretty simple...

Play it on what you have or decline the invitation if you can't or won't do it because of range/endurance issues.

The other option, I guess, is to buy a bass tuba. If I were in your position, I'd start practicing the piece on what I had. You'll build endurance and "high chops" and will have greater mastery of the CC tuba in the end.
The Darling Of The Thirty-Cents-Sharp Low D♭'s.
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

I'll just hack it on my CC. The rehearsals are at the end of the day, around when I usually hit the studio, so it doesn't matter if it kills my chops for a while, I'll get used to it.
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
User avatar
TubaTodd
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 673
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Birmingham, Alabama

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by TubaTodd »

I was handed a piece by one of the graduate conducting students at WVU that is for percussion ensemble with a small group of wind instruments.
Does this imply that the student wrote it or did they just hand it to you? If they wrote it, I wonder if they were familiar with the tessitura that a tuba part is typically written in. For example, the Symphony #1 (Lord of the Rings) for wind ensemble by Johan de Meij has a tuba part that is written clearly in the trombone range. Any group I've ever performed that with dropped the tuba part down an octave. He is a trombonist so I think the common thought was that he was writing the part as if it were being read on a trombone.

Someone correct me if I am wrong on that one.
Todd Morgan
Besson 995
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

Todd, He did not write the piece, it was composed by a Mexican composer whose name currently escapes me. It has only been played on it's premier, at the University of Houston. I am not even sure that there is a recording of the piece for me to look up. I think the composer comprehends the tuba range, because the line doesnt go above a d above the staff or below CC below the staff, I just think he intended it for a bass tuba with the range in which he wrote it, but I have no confirmation.
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

Sounds like very good advice bloke. Nice shameless plug as well, lol. That is a really good idea, although I am not sure how I feel about playing the mouthpiece game. My philosophy has always been to find one that I like my sound on, and use it for everything. I am about to let go of a G&W bayamo that was my piece before i was persuaded to try the schilke. It is also a possibility that I may have to buy a PT-50 as that is the required mouthpiece used by The Carolina Crown DBC (I'll know that in two weeks). I don't really know that I can Justify buying 2 mouthpieces in 2 weeks to the people holding the purse strings. The advice is good, and I may attempt it, but it will be tough to do.

Andrew "Friggin loves the amount of good advice on this forum" M.
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
Bob Kolada
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 2632
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 1:57 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by Bob Kolada »

WVUtubaman12 wrote:It is also a possibility that I may have to buy a PT-50 as that is the required mouthpiece used by The Carolina Crown DBC (I'll know that in two weeks).
:?:
WVUtubaman12
bugler
bugler
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Morgantown, WV

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by WVUtubaman12 »

Carolina Crown requires all players of like instruments to use the same mouthpiece. Trumpets VB-3c etc. The tubes have to use a PT-50. I think they are doing this to try and take out as many variables in tone production as they can. If we all use the "same" horn, "same" mouthpiece, and their very detailed technique program for playing, we should all sound exactly alike, right? Well, I wouldn't judge because they skyrocketed from the mid tier of World class DBC' s in the last 3 years to winning the Jim Ott (best hornline) trophy last year.
Capital Regiment 2009: Contra "Section Leader"
Principal WVU Orchestra
Mountaineer Brass Quintet
Phalanges of Fire 3.5 and 4.5

Jupiter 1284S
Cerveny 653
Dynasty 010-M880 "C26034"
Gold Plated Schilke 67
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Equipment implied by a piece

Post by bort »

WVUtubaman12 wrote:...we should all sound exactly alike, right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PijbSFmzuUc" target="_blank
Post Reply