MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
cookiemonster
lurker
lurker
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:37 pm
Location: Michigan

MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by cookiemonster »

Has anyone tried the new Meinl Weston 751 Euph?

I currently play on a MW 451 and really enjoy it except for the tuning issues. So I am wondering if this new 751 is worth the money for all the extra gadgets.
User avatar
druby
bugler
bugler
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:11 pm

Re: MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by druby »

A number of folks over on Dave Werden's web site have tried the MW751. None of us have spent enough time on the horn to have a solid opinion. I have a few thoughts, however, based on limited data:

In playing one in the TUSABTEC elephant room this year, it was just about the least favorite of all the horns I tried. The horn there had very poor valve action. I also played one at Sam Ash's store in NYC this last week. Valve action was better. Though responsive, both horns seemed "bright" in their sound. The mechanics of the trigger are quite poor. The paddle for the trigger hits the 3rd valve slide and the metal lever is easily bent. Intonation was unknown since it was impossible to tell in the elephant room.

I am not a fan of MW euphs, but if you are considering a larger sounding horn than the MW451, look at the Miraphone 5050, Besson 2052, or Sterling Virtuoso. They are all in the same price range (low $6's to $7K). If you are interested in a more compact sound, the Willson 2900 is tops. (Note: I loved playing the 2900 that was at the show, the 2950 and 2960 not so much).

Doug
cookiemonster
lurker
lurker
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 3:37 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by cookiemonster »

druby,

Thanks for the input. My main reason for moving up to that horn was for the trigger (for better intonation) and for good valve action. I find what you say about the valves quite interesting because my current horn's valves are very sluggish. Do you know how this horn would compare to the Besson prestige?
User avatar
druby
bugler
bugler
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 7:11 pm

Re: MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by druby »

I play a Prestige 2051 and a Sterling Virtuoso with 300mm heavy red brass bell. There is NO comparison between these and the MW751 (IMHO). The valve action on the Besson is incomparable. The best in the world. The valve action on the Sterling (uses Bauerfiend valveset) is very good, though not as good as the Besson. Both have great trigger assemblies, the Besson is lighter in action.
bbocaner
bugler
bugler
Posts: 238
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:23 pm

Re: MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by bbocaner »

I'd rather play an instrument with inherently good intonation and no trigger than one with bad intonation with a trigger. Of course, good intonation with a trigger would be the best of both worlds...
tubinator
lurker
lurker
Posts: 3
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:34 pm
Location: germany, heidelberg

Re: MW 751 Pheonix Euph...

Post by tubinator »

Hi,

I am playing a 551 and really like it, except the tuning. I tried one last year at Musikmesse in Frankfurt. To me it didn´t make much difference and the tuning was about the same as mine. you have to spend some money to buy one. I don´t know if it is worth the money. I played a Miraphone 5050 and I loved it.
Post Reply