which is the fastest?
- WoodSheddin
- 5 valves
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 9:44 pm
- Location: On the bike
- Contact:
- Dan Schultz
- TubaTinker
- Posts: 10424
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Newburgh, Indiana
- Contact:
Saw him play "Flight of the Bumblee". Heck... he doesn't need valves!WoodSheddin wrote:Pat Sheridan plays faster
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
- Contact:
Re: which is the fastest?
Not in my case.Imperial wrote:I heard somebody say that rotor valvues is faster to play with than pistons. Is that true?
Could it really make a difference?
Rick "equally slow on both" Denney
- Lew
- 5 valves
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 4:57 pm
- Location: Annville, PA
The total distance that the valve paddle has to travel on most rotary valves is less than the travel distance of most piston valves. In theory therefore, it would take a shorter amount of time to engage a rotary valve than a piston valve.
In practice the difference is so negligible as to be undiscernable in playing. Would Pat Sheridan be able to play even faster on a rotary valve horn than on a piston valve horn? Maybe, but you would never be able to hear the difference.
In practice the difference is so negligible as to be undiscernable in playing. Would Pat Sheridan be able to play even faster on a rotary valve horn than on a piston valve horn? Maybe, but you would never be able to hear the difference.
- GC
- 5 valves
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
- Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)
valve speed
Some rotaries are faster than some pistons, and vice versa.


- Dylan King
- YouTube Tubist
- Posts: 1602
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 1:56 am
- Location: Weddington, NC, USA.
- Contact:
-
- bugler
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 7:12 pm
- Location: Northern Colorado
I have't played too many rotary valved tubas so I might not have a very wide base on them but I think it all depends upon the lubrication, springs, fit, and mostly the player. I recently replaced the springs in my piston valves with some stronger ones and now my valves are faster than most of the trumpet's valves in my band. The rotary valves I have played had a much shorter move than any tuba piston but I didn't really think they were any faster, just less movement for the fingers.
Ben
Ben
- Anterux
- pro musician
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 6:43 am
- Location: Portugal
- Contact:
Piston valves and rotary valves are different. they feel different.
In theory, rotary should be faster then Piston. but just a tiny little bit faster.
If I like more the feeling of pistons (and I do) I should be faster in pistons (and I think I am).
Someone very wisely, said earier in this forum:
Valves good, holes bad.
In theory, rotary should be faster then Piston. but just a tiny little bit faster.
If I like more the feeling of pistons (and I do) I should be faster in pistons (and I think I am).
Someone very wisely, said earier in this forum:
Valves good, holes bad.

-
- bugler
- Posts: 100
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 10:23 am
- Location: La Grange, CA
- Kevin Hendrick
- 6 valves
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
- Location: Location: Location
Indeed, I can find no flaw in your reasoning ... eminently logical ...mandrake wrote:I feel the same way about rotor valves. I think that after all of these responses, we can agree that my original answer of "bananas" is correct.Davidrn1 wrote:I prefer pistons. get much better articulation with them. Not so "thumpy" of a tone. Pistons seem much faster to me.

I'm not convinced about the "holes bad" part. If you're really looking for speed, I suspect that keys (ophicleide) would be faster than either pistons or rotors, and open holes (serpent) would be faster yet ...Anterux wrote:Piston valves and rotary valves are different. they feel different.
In theory, rotary should be faster then Piston. but just a tiny little bit faster.
If I like more the feeling of pistons (and I do) I should be faster in pistons (and I think I am).
Someone very wisely, said earier in this forum:
Valves good, holes bad.

"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
- Contact:
- Rick Denney
- Resident Genius
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
- Contact:
- Dan Schultz
- TubaTinker
- Posts: 10424
- Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
- Location: Newburgh, Indiana
- Contact:
I don't worry much about how fast my valves (pistons OR rotors) are as I usually find that my chops set my limits! 

Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.