Why are composers considered musicians?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
chronolith
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:26 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by chronolith »

Mark wrote:Are you correlating 4'33" with the prize in a box of cat litter?
As with all things in "art" you must decide for yourself. Besides, I would not dare derail this thread!
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

chronolith wrote:As with all things in "art" you must decide for yourself. Besides, I would not dare derail this thread!
With the exception of tuba playing, I have a simple definition of art (e.g. painting, sculpture). If I can do it, it's not art.

(Addendum: I've been to the Rothko Chapel. I can do that. What I can't do is convince someone to pay me a large some of money for that. You have to admire Rothko. How much did Cage make from 4'33"? I might have to admire him too.)
kprinz
bugler
bugler
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:40 am
Location: Brenham, Texas

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by kprinz »

I spent some time studying composition with Martin Mailman at University of North Texas. I was fortunate enough to hear a masterclass where he went through an had people name the different components in music...the punch line: after everything was boiled down to its simplest terms and all of the musical components were put into their proper categories, a definition of music would emerge.

Sound (Silence) in Time with Intent.

Of these three components within the definition, I believe the latter is truly the pin that holds the definition together. I particularly like this definition because it is simple, open to diverse types of music without biase to point of origin, time period, etc, and pretty all-encompassing while still being somewhat selective.
Kendall Prinz
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College

Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
User avatar
Anterux
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 331
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 6:43 am
Location: Portugal
Contact:

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Anterux »

The listener*, with it's creative mind**, has a word*** to say here.

What one considers music may not be noticed as such by other.

I think only the listener* can judge that. So, if the judgement can vary, music may not be universal.

___________________
*the listener can be the composer and the executant at the same time.
**or not. or anything in the middle. or something else...
***may be the most important one, no?


EDIT: So, could I make something not intended to be music, but some listener hears it as music?
Mark

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by Mark »

bloke wrote:As just one blaring example of composers not being musicians, I would point to Mahler.
Gustav or Alma? If I were to whack an anvil with a hammer, would that be music? What if I whacked it three times? Or two times. No, three times. Well, two times. No, three..
kprinz
bugler
bugler
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:40 am
Location: Brenham, Texas

Re: Why are composers considered musicians?

Post by kprinz »

In nature you can find rhythm, harmony, melody, etc...however, I don't believe there is any artistic intent.

Is aleatory music...yes if it is meant to portray an artistic concept or intent event if the product of the composition changes from performance to performance there is artistic intent.
Kendall Prinz
Tuba, Composition, Music Education
Asst. Director of Bands
Instructor of Tuba & Euphonium
Blinn College

Miraphone 186-5U CC
Miraphone Elektra 481-6U Gold Brass F
Post Reply