Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply

Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Totally free-blowing, no resistance
7
18%
A little resistance
19
50%
Moderate resistance
8
21%
Lots of resistance
0
No votes
Question is too broad or needs more options
4
11%
 
Total votes: 38

User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by GC »

How many prefer mouthpieces/horns that are totally free-blowing and how many prefer a bit of resistance? Personally, I cannot properly play instruments that are too free-blowing. A moderate amount of resistance is essential for me to be able to control my tone and dynamics. Others I've talked to can't stand a horn that's not free-blowing, and the least hint of stuffiness drives them nuts.

Your opinions, please?
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by bort »

I think it depends on the tuba, too. My benchmark for "no resistance" was a Cerveny Kaiser that I tried some years ago. It was like breathing into a trashcan. Sounded nice, but it needed more air than I had.
mbell
bugler
bugler
Posts: 68
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 11:46 am

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by mbell »

bort wrote:I think it depends on the tuba, too. My benchmark for "no resistance" was a Cerveny Kaiser that I tried some years ago. It was like breathing into a trashcan. Sounded nice, but it needed more air than I had.
I feel a little better that someone else is confirming this for me. I find my Cerveny Kaiser takes quite a bit of air too. It's actually not too bad down to the Bb or A below the staff, but then it starts to require considerable more air as you go down. I tried an Alan Baer mouthpiece with Euro shank on it and I don't think anyone short of Alan Baer himself could provide enough air for that combination.

mike
Michael Bell
Austin, Texas

Cerveny 601 Kaiser(1962), Cerveny Piggy(1970s), Reynolds sousaphone (1959)
Austin Civic Wind Ensemble
Austin Brass Band
St. Edward's Orchestra
User avatar
MartyNeilan
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 4878
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:06 am
Location: Practicing counting rests.

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by MartyNeilan »

I agree that is varies with the tuba. A very open blowing tuba needs a mouthpiece that is a litte tighter (and/or a tighter leadpipe, as has been often done with the MW45SLP F tuba leadpipe on certain 6/4 BAT's)
A "tight" playing tuba needs a more open mouthpiece. 186's tend to work better in a large ensemble with a very large mouthpiece; save the smaller pieces on them for solo recital and the medium pieces for chamber.
My large "BART" project currently plays its best with a Blokepiece solo for all-around use and a modified C4 for smaller and higher usage. The Blokepiece imperial is very boarderline - anything bigger just doesn't work right and requires an inordinate amount of effort on my part. Back when it was all rotors, the rotors added a little more resistance and I could get away with a bigger mouthpiece at times. But, the leadpipe is still huge and requires an adapter with an additional sleeve around it just to take a modern day American or "Euro" shank mouthpiece. With a 45SLP leadpipe and a smaller receiver, it might play tighter enough that I could possibly use larger pieces on it again. Since I found two mouthpieces that currenty work well on it, I am in no hurry to pursue that modification.
caa62
bugler
bugler
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 10:38 pm
Location: Queensbury, NY

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by caa62 »

Normally, I like little resistance, as it makes me feel like I have more control. However the BBb I'm playing now has the best sound and low range with a PT-48 that has a large cup and bore. In my .812 horn, it doesn't give much resistance, and takes a lot of wind. So I practice more and build up my wind. :tuba:

You can't always get what you want...
DBB-641 BBb/TU-27,
Cousenon small bell-front BBb/Dillon M1C
Conn 14J Eb/Wick 5L,
DEG Marching Euph/Schilke 51,
King 623/Kelly 51D
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by GC »

I understand the whole "blowing into a trashcan" comment very well. After a 24-year layoff from tuba, I began playing again in 2001. I bought a used Cerveny 601 CC since I always loved big horns when I played in high school and college. Unfortunately, I was unable to control the beast; it took so much air that I would cover up smaller groups like a cat with a litter box. Trying mouthpieces with more resistance helped slightly, but with a horn that felt like having a vacuum cleaner attached to your lips they could only do so much.

My question was intended for more normal instruments instead of the extremes, and I should have said so.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
User avatar
Doug Elliott
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 613
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:59 pm

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by Doug Elliott »

"Resistance" can be very deceptive. For the most part, "blowing resistance" and "acoustical resistance" are two entirely different things.
Blowing resistance feels like what it is, but acoustical resistance actually feels the opposite of what it is. The maximum acoustical resistance is when you are producing a strong resonance in the instrument, and it takes LESS air to keep the resonance going. That feels OPEN. When the instrument is not resonating well, it takes a lot of air and feels TIGHT, partly because you are creating more resistance in your chops as a result of the instrument giving you no feedback.

So be careful not to mistake "open" with "good." There is definitely such a thing as "too open" and it's not on the "good" end of the spectrum.
User avatar
MaryAnn
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Occasionally Visiting Pipsqueak
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:58 am

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by MaryAnn »

I don't gots no idea. What I have noticed is that if I'm in a hall that talks back to me I seem to need a whole lot less air than I need in a hall that swallows my sound.
MA
User avatar
Kevin Hendrick
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3156
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Location: Location

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by Kevin Hendrick »

bloke wrote:Resistance is futile.
... we will be what kinda immolated? :lol:
"Don't take life so serious, son. It ain't nohow permanent." -- Pogo (via Walt Kelly)
User avatar
GC
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1800
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 5:52 am
Location: Rome, GA (between Rosedale and Armuchee)

Re: Mouthpiece resistance; like it or not?

Post by GC »

I'd rather be assimilated than immolated, thanks.
JP/Sterling 377 compensating Eb; Warburton "The Grail" T.G.4, RM-9 7.8, Yamaha 66D4; for sale > 1914 Conn Monster Eb (my avatar), ca. 1905 Fillmore Bros 1/4-size Eb, Bach 42B trombone
Post Reply