Yes my mistake, typed it wrong, I've corrected my original post!! Sorry about the confusion. This particular subject seems to be riddled with confusion, trying to research it on line you find different sources of varying levels of authority that advocate both viewpoints. Technically if you say that the difference is bore size you are correct since with a Conical Bore the bore size will be bigger on a Conical instrument than on a Cylindrical one. If the difference between a Euphonium and Baritone is stricktly a matter of bore size then at what bore size does the nomenclature change? What about instruments that start out with a smaller bore such as the Yamaha YEP-321, and most of the older US made horns made by King, and Conn, et. all. Then there is the whole US, versus Brittish, versus German nomenclature thing, add in Tenor Tubas, etc. Very difficult subject. I've always been under the impression the difference was strickly one of Conical Versus Cylindrical, but then researching it I can find experts on both sides of the fence. I know from experiece playing both that they do have a different tonal characteristic and isn't that the part that matters (unless your trying to design and build them)?Rick F wrote:Huh is right. 'radar' just typed it backwards.Radar wrote:<snip>This has the effect on the tone that Cylindrical instruments have a more mellow less bright tonal coloring, and more conical instruments have a brighter tone with more attack.
As you can see I've had too much time on my hands today, I've been stuck in waiting rooms most of the day.



