Based on either persons experience on both of these horns. How do these horn compare in
Ease of use:
Is one more open or more stuffy than the other?
Versatility:
Is the Getzen just as versatile as the Rudy? Or does it suffer some serious drawback in certain ensemble settings?
Sound:
Pretty ambiguous... leave up to your opinions.
Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
- Cthuba
- bugler

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:57 pm
Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
Gnagey 4/4
That which is dead can eternal lie and with many strange aeons even tubas will fly
-A Misquote from HP Lovecraft.
That which is dead can eternal lie and with many strange aeons even tubas will fly
-A Misquote from HP Lovecraft.
- bort
- 6 valves

- Posts: 11223
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Re: Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
I haven't owned a Getzen, but my impression from playing a few is that it is a very capable and flexible tuba. For a time David Fedderly used one in the Baltimore Symphony when he needed a 4/4 tuba. I remember it being very open and easy to play.
With a large bell and pistons, it just has a totally different sound, so you will have to decide for yourself there. It is certainly bigger than the Rudy 3/4, but to my ear, I like the Rudy sound better. Frankly, having played my Rudy 4/4 next to an excellent Rudy 3/4, I liked the size of the 4/4 sound better, even if it loses about 5% of the Rudy 3/4 "magic" (how is *that* for subjective!).
My biggest problem with the Getzen is its physical size -- its really short, so the bell is all up in your ear. Personally, I don't like that. MANY people have NO problem with it though.
So... Both good, both different. Personally, I like the Rudy better, but have no real beefs with the Getzen.
With a large bell and pistons, it just has a totally different sound, so you will have to decide for yourself there. It is certainly bigger than the Rudy 3/4, but to my ear, I like the Rudy sound better. Frankly, having played my Rudy 4/4 next to an excellent Rudy 3/4, I liked the size of the 4/4 sound better, even if it loses about 5% of the Rudy 3/4 "magic" (how is *that* for subjective!).
My biggest problem with the Getzen is its physical size -- its really short, so the bell is all up in your ear. Personally, I don't like that. MANY people have NO problem with it though.
So... Both good, both different. Personally, I like the Rudy better, but have no real beefs with the Getzen.
-
DouglasJB
- 4 valves

- Posts: 585
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:47 pm
Re: Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
My G50 is the only horn i have ever owned and it can do everything you need to do. A very versatile horn.
-
tubanerd360
- lurker

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
I couldn't agree more. I have had my Getzen for 4 years now, using it in everything from symphony orchestra to wind symphony to small ensembles. It works great!DouglasJB wrote:My G50 is the only horn i have ever owned and it can do everything you need to do. A very versatile horn.
Getzen CB50
-
tbn.al
- 6 valves

- Posts: 3004
- Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Atlanta, Ga
Re: Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
At what point in the bugle is the bore being measured?
I am fortunate to have a great job that feeds my family well, but music feeds my soul.
- Ricko
- bugler

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2004 8:42 am
- Location: Nashville, TN
Re: Getzen G-50 vs Rudy 3/4
Ike Harris in Nashville (IkeH here) has owned both of these horns. You might drop him a note or give him a call for a very good opinion.