Thailand tidal wave pic

Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
Forum rules
Be kind. No government, state, or local politics allowed. Admin has final decision for any/all removed posts.
User avatar
fpoon
bugler
bugler
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Williamsburg, VA

Post by fpoon »

I think I would just utter an f bomb or two...

I would imagine it's the same thing as hitting a patch of black ice and KNOWING you are going to crash. Nothing you can do so stop it, you were just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10424
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Dan Schultz »

That's an awesome picture. I can't help to think that the guy on the beach may have had a better chance of surviving than someone who was near the buildings on the beach.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

Holy cow, 8.5 on the Richter scale is no joke.

What was the rating of the previous one?
User avatar
Doug@GT
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:05 am
Location: Athens, Ga

Post by Doug@GT »

Leland wrote:Holy cow, 8.5 on the Richter scale is no joke.

What was the rating of the previous one?
I want to say 9.0 but I could be wrong.
"It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged."
~G.K. Chesterton
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Leland wrote:Holy cow, 8.5 on the Richter scale is no joke.

What was the rating of the previous one?
As I recall, it was a 9, which is massive--nearly three times the power of 8.5.

They have been talking about additional adjustments in the subduction zone as a result of the big earthquake, and this is one of them. It may take a while before the region has settled down again.

But it won't ever be stable. At least two of the five largest vocanic explosions in recorded history have occurred in this zone. One of them created world-wide winter for the entire following year. The other one bounced shock waves through the atmosphere that circles the globe 7 times, created a sound that was heard 3000 miles away, a tsunami that destroyed the lower levels of what is now Jakarta, and was noticeable in tide fluctuations even in England.

This place is a little puff of ash by comparison:

Image

Rick "who took this picture before recent eruptions" Denney
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

Rick Denney wrote:As I recall, it was a 9, which is massive--nearly three times the power of 8.5.
Yeah, 9's don't happen often at all. Back in grade school, I went to a geekfest at the university that had science-oriented classes & activities. One of them was plotting earthquake epicenters, mainly around the Pacific Rim. Among the group of us, I remember two 9+'s among what was probably a couple hundred plots.

Krakatoa was crazy. Anybody running an office pool on the next big island-destroying eruption? :wink:
User avatar
Rick Denney
Resident Genius
Posts: 6650
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2004 1:18 am
Contact:

Post by Rick Denney »

Leland wrote:Krakatoa was crazy. Anybody running an office pool on the next big island-destroying eruption? :wink:
Not all subduction-zone volcanoes are on islands. Krakatoa has recreated itself to approximately have the size it was when it blew up in 1883. It could go again at any old time.

My personal pick is Rainier. Big slabs of igneous rock tilted on each other, with wet mud holding them in place. A good jiggle could trigger an epic event even without an eruption. I was there two years ago and the hair stood on the back of my neck when I thought about it.

Two days later, I was at the observation center at Johnston Ridge at St. Helens (where I took the above picture). That little puff of smoke folded over 12-foot-diameter trees like so many matchsticks, with an explosion that moved so slowly that its rate of expansion was less than the speed of sound. In other words, it was No Big Deal by subduction-zone event standards.

Rick "fascinated--from a healthy distance--by volcanoes" Denney
User avatar
ThomasDodd
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1161
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 11:37 am
Location: BFE, Mississippi

Post by ThomasDodd »

Rick Denney wrote:My personal pick is Rainier. Big slabs of igneous rock tilted on each other, with wet mud holding them in place. A good jiggle could trigger an epic event even without an eruption.
I wondering when Vesuvius is goning to blow again. It's due for that 2000 year blast.
User avatar
funkcicle
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 275
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:23 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Post by funkcicle »

What if Old Faithful were to go? I imagine that'd catch a lot of people off guard!

(I don't know if that's even possible, but apparently there's a SciFi movie with this scenario).
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

schlepporello wrote:Yeah, if I understand this correctly, almost all of the Yellowstone national park area (primarily where the thermal events are) is supposed to be part of an enormous crater. I think what will happen if it goes is that the effect will be much like letting the air out of an inflated balloon, except on a global scale. :wink:
What, a giant geothermal fart?
:wink: :lol:

I wonder, though, if its constant venting will help stave off an eruption. But, then again, blowing off steam doesn't really do anything to keep magma underground, either.
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

chris combest wrote:Bigger than Vesuvius unfortunately. Closer to Krakatoa.

http://www.solcomhouse.com/yellowstone.htm
Wow -- guess I won't be driving my car much for the few weeks afterwards. Don't want all that dust to muck up the engine, ya know.
Jonathan Fowler
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 8:32 am
Location: West Chester, PA

Post by Jonathan Fowler »

I'll vote for Rainier

It's a very active andesitic range and Rainer has been showing all of the signs for almost 10 years now.
Might want to stay away from Mariners in your 2005 fantasy teams :twisted:



jon
User avatar
funkcicle
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 275
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 5:23 pm
Location: Asheville, NC

Post by funkcicle »

chris combest wrote:Bigger than Vesuvius unfortunately. Closer to Krakatoa.

http://www.solcomhouse.com/yellowstone.htm
scary! :shock:
Post Reply