Preach.chronolith wrote:I choose a 6/4 because I don't have a 7/4 and my 8/4 is currently ventilating my house.
POLL
-
TubaZac2012
- 3 valves

- Posts: 319
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:44 am
- Location: Florence, Alabama
Re: POLL
Zac Riley
Shoals Community Band
Twickenham Winds
Huntsville Brass Band Contrabass Tuba
Madison Community Symphony Orchestra
York/King/Reynolds Custom Tabor Build Franken York CC
Shoals Community Band
Twickenham Winds
Huntsville Brass Band Contrabass Tuba
Madison Community Symphony Orchestra
York/King/Reynolds Custom Tabor Build Franken York CC
-
eutubabone
- 3 valves

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:42 pm
- Location: Stone Mountain, Georgia
Re: POLL
I am really tired of this poll concerning 6/4 tubas. What about a similar poll about the 5/4, and then another one about 4/4 tubas?
Don't leave these tubas out, because they're important too, and the results of these polls would have great influence on future purchases for some folks.(Sorry, forgot about the 3/4, sorry, sorry)
-
TubaSteve
- bugler

- Posts: 156
- Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: SE Wisconsin
Re: POLL
That's funny Bob! Just last week, I told our new director at our local community band where I have been playing my "5/4" Reynolds recording bell horn at that I have an even bigger horn on the way! (The 350 that Lee is working on). The look on her face was priceless!roweenie wrote:This poll must have been devised in the Soviet Union.
...or maybe by Henry Ford: "you can have any size tuba you want, as long as it's 6/4".
+1PaulMaybery wrote:"On the more serious side, the 6/4 has a great harmonic complexity even in the PPP passages. And ... when you finally master blowing that piece of tubing, it is surprisingly responsive and nimble.
Honestly, I think a 6/4 tuba does more damage visually than it does sonically.
P.S. - If you really want to scare the sh*t out of a conductor, show up with a recording bell 6/4 tuba; it's a lot of fun.
Steve
MW-25, 2-Reynolds 170 (BBb Recording Bass), Reynolds 180 (EEb Recording Bass) , 2-Reynolds 140 Sousaphones, Holton 350, others.....
-
Bacchanalia
- bugler

- Posts: 72
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 1:38 am
- Location: New Orleans
Re: POLL
I'm overwhelmed by the ridiculous array of choices and just can't decide. Uhh...eenie, meenie, minee, MO! OK, I'm going with MO...as in MO Tuba ;0)
Rob Frazier
**************
Mack Brass TU-200S
Mack Brass TB-831L Bass Bone
Mouthpiece Menagerie - Blokepieces when it counts
**************
Mack Brass TU-200S
Mack Brass TB-831L Bass Bone
Mouthpiece Menagerie - Blokepieces when it counts
-
Three Valves
- 6 valves

- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:44 am
- Location: With my fellow Thought Criminals
Re: POLL
Exactly.
If a little is good, MO is better!!
If a little is good, MO is better!!
I am committed to the advancement of civil rights, minus the Marxist intimidation and thuggery of BLM.
- PaulMaybery
- pro musician

- Posts: 736
- Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:10 am
- Location: Prior Lake, Minnesota
Re: POLL
A unique aspect of the BAT: Once playing softly and 'controlling the breath" is accomplished (to a very fine and 'efficient' level) the BAT is to a degree much more efficient than smaller, say 4/4, tubas. It blows very openly and actually takes much less effort to project and fill the space. Plus an added advantage is that the pianissimos are to die for.
The trick for BAT newbies is finding the time and 'wherewithal' to really get into playing the instrument artistically. We joke about it being a cannon or volcano, which it can be when needed. But if we are going to use it as our main tuba, then it needs to be flexible. It really does not need to be pushed strenuously at all. Just give it a good steady stream of wind and buzz, and surprisingly it takes over.
I can see how conductors may be afraid of the size, but it does not have to destroy the ensemble in the hands of a sensible player. For those with that "over abundance of testosterone" perhaps this may be a bit of an issue.
I try to remember my first image of Jake sitting in the back row of the CSO and looking "effortless" in his playing, yet such a wonderful sound.
The trick for BAT newbies is finding the time and 'wherewithal' to really get into playing the instrument artistically. We joke about it being a cannon or volcano, which it can be when needed. But if we are going to use it as our main tuba, then it needs to be flexible. It really does not need to be pushed strenuously at all. Just give it a good steady stream of wind and buzz, and surprisingly it takes over.
I can see how conductors may be afraid of the size, but it does not have to destroy the ensemble in the hands of a sensible player. For those with that "over abundance of testosterone" perhaps this may be a bit of an issue.
I try to remember my first image of Jake sitting in the back row of the CSO and looking "effortless" in his playing, yet such a wonderful sound.
Wessex 5/4 CC "Wyvern"
Wessex 4/4 F "Berg"
Wessex Cimbasso F
Mack Euphonium
Mack Bass Trombone
Conn 5V Double Bell Euphonium (casually for sale to an interested party)
Wessex 4/4 F "Berg"
Wessex Cimbasso F
Mack Euphonium
Mack Bass Trombone
Conn 5V Double Bell Euphonium (casually for sale to an interested party)
- bort
- 6 valves

- Posts: 11223
- Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
- Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Re: POLL
One of the biggest downsides to owning a BAT, however, is that it has done *nothing* to improve my articulations, sense of rhythm, memory for sharps/flats, etc. But hey, I can check "tone" off the list, eh? 