Modern American rotary tubas

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by bort »

GregTuba79 wrote:Well considering 90% of Kanstul's tuba production are concert tubas it doesn't make sense in our understanding...but production wise he would need another shop just for rotary valves I am sure. :lol:
Ah...well, that shows what I know, I only think of Kanstul when I think of marching brass. All I know for sure is that Kanstul seems extremely UNpopular on the east coast -- I've seen exactly one Kanstul tuba in the wild. I'm sure there are more, but I sure never saw them.
User avatar
bort
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 11:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by bort »

Ian, you are right. I always figured that ever since Miraphone was in southern California, and Tommy Johnson and other big names used rotary tubas, this might still be a regionally popular option.

Oh well. California is a wacky place. :)
sailn2ba
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 365
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 4:53 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by sailn2ba »

Hmm! Must've done something wrong with my post.
I think that lots of folks would pay American prices for an American product. Has any one with REAL marketing expertise looked at the national, tuba key, price, sales volume ($ and units), etc. total market? . . Would be some interesting data.
And, BTW, my Mira 184 3 RV is better for marching than some Sousas I've tried.
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10427
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by Dan Schultz »

bort wrote:.... I've seen exactly one Kanstul tuba in the wild. I'm sure there are more, but I sure never saw them.
I've never seen anything except marching brass here in the Indiana/Kentucky/Illinois area. I didn't think they made concert tubas, either!
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
toobagrowl
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1525
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 3:12 pm
Location: USA

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by toobagrowl »

GregTuba79 wrote: They DO make a lot of marching brass yes, mostly trumpet/baritone/tenor stuff & of course Contras. Their professional Concert tubas (grand orchestral, etc) are many steps in quality and sound perfection than the marching brass IMO...drum corps guys probably would say the opposite. There's some pretty cool videos on YouTube if you search for Kanstul Tuba NAMM show...
It seems most DCI groups these days march with BBb Yamaha and Jupiter horns, and sound great on 'em :!: I understand Kanstul used to have that market, but not anymore. And why doesn't Kanstul make a sousaphone?
GregTuba79 wrote: I think Tommy and Roger Bobo stopped using Miraphones 30 years ago? my guess...at least Bobo did and Tommy's go-to horn was some massive 6/4 CSO type horn for jingles and studio/soundtrack work.
Didn't Tommy use a Neptune as his big horn in his later years? It seems Bobo and Johnson used various tubas later on, especially Yamahas. I understand Jim Self primarily plays Yamahas.
User avatar
opus37
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1326
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:22 pm
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by opus37 »

Kanstul does make good concert tubas. I own one and am very happy with it. I think it important to remember that the big name pros play the instrument brand that sponsors them. Case in point, how many different brands of tuba has Chuck Dallenbach played and when did he play them? There was a recent discussion on this net speculating on which horn he will now play since Conn Selmer has taken over sponsorship of the Canadian Brass. Pros can make most any brand sound good. I know a lot of folks who prefer rotary horns. I've played both. Each style has advantages and disadvantages. I think has more to do with what you are used to playing.
Brian
1892 Courtiere (J.W. Pepper Import) Helicon Eb
1980's Yamaha 321 euphonium
2007 Miraphone 383 Starlight
2010 Kanstul 66T
2016 Bubbie Mark 5
User avatar
Jose the tuba player
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:21 am
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by Jose the tuba player »

pjv wrote:Or Selmer could copy the Tiger tuba and not only be the first American company to make a plastic tuba but also to copy a Chinese instrument maker.
And use rotary valves.
i think they would just do what they did with the Pbone.
WTB OLDS SOUSAPHONE WITH 20 INCH BELL
User avatar
PaulMaybery
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri Jan 17, 2014 7:10 am
Location: Prior Lake, Minnesota

Re: Modern American rotary tubas

Post by PaulMaybery »

Ah! The upright valve Eb compensating 3 + 1 Besson. Having had 10 years on it in a Salvation Army Band and ensembles(Treble Clef) I still was never able to wrap my head around playing it in Bass Clef) I know it looks almost the same (notes on the same lines) but the accidentals always messed with me, plus when I considered the actual key vs the transposition - (augh!!!!). All that being said, to this day I still think that Besson EEb is the best tuba out there, acoustically speaking. It had the best intonation, good even response, wonderful tone and presence. I can see why in the UK they are preferred in the orchestras.
I never quite mastered the RH 4th valve, though now playing a lot of euph, that is improving. What am I getting at. That Eb Besson is a great horn. The 3 valve version where the compensation is between those 3 valves is a great concept. Really helps intonation, not just a rarely used "add-on." I'm also enjoying using the recording bell more these days and find it a plus in the right situations.

So, I suppose I have just taken Bloke's comments and added my own. Apologies for digressing from the original post.

In mulling it over, there is a possibility to slap a rotor section on an American style tuba/bugle. It has be done before, but never really caught on. (King/Conn/Martin)
Me thinks the key here would be to start with a particularly good American style 'bugle' and offer it with rotary valves. (Marzan did that, and MW recreated the Wm Bell Model based on the American King - both were rotary with the shorter American lead pipe.) Many of the euro companies (MW/BS/VMI/Willson/Hirsbrunner) offer their merchandise with both rotary and piston. For the sake of argument, "Why not the reverse?"

In the realm of 'psycho-acoustics', could it be that some folks simply want a signature/custom-like tuba that looks different from most of what is out there? Frankensteins do have an appeal.
Wessex 5/4 CC "Wyvern"
Wessex 4/4 F "Berg"
Wessex Cimbasso F
Mack Euphonium
Mack Bass Trombone
Conn 5V Double Bell Euphonium (casually for sale to an interested party)
Post Reply