Silver plating

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

You'll notice more difference with a mouthpiece change. The thickness of silver plate that's laid on is a fraction of the diameter of a human hair.

Silver's silver--it'll tarnish the same no matter whether it's satin or shiny. You may not notice the tarnish on satin as much, however.
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10424
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Dan Schultz »

Silver vs. raw vs. lacquer.... not much difference that MY ear can tell. However... I own some each and I can certainly tell you that the satin finish is by far the toughest to keep clean.... unless you LIKE the look of tarnished silver :wink:
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
windshieldbug
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Once got the "hand" as a cue
Posts: 11516
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: 8vb

Post by windshieldbug »

I always thought I can hear a difference, because the thickness of raw/plating is different than that of "paint". I always liked the bare metal's sound and response, and I even stripped the lacquer off my CC, which I wanted to "liven up" and then left it patina. On THAT horn, I thought that was the best sound and response - which is what I wanted, looks be hanged!

You don't say if it's lacquered, but if you like the sound, why change?
Instead of talking to your plants, if you yelled at them would they still grow, but only to be troubled and insecure?
Post Reply