Rotary and Piston PT6 vs Thor

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
dasanchezr
bugler
bugler
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 10:51 pm

Rotary and Piston PT6 vs Thor

Post by dasanchezr »

Hello Everyone,

I was wondering if any of you could give me some feedback about this issue
I currently have a MW Thor and I have being using in my current job the Simon Bolivar Symphony Orchestra in Venezuela and altough this horn is doing the job quite well I dont fell entirelly confortable with it. I have being considering switching to either one of the PT6 models or the Rudolf Meinl 5/4 model and I was wondering if you have opinions about these models and how they would compare to the Thor.

Thank you very much,
Daniel Sanchez.
User avatar
gregsundt
Undecided
Undecided
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: South Cackalackee

Re: Rotary and Piston PT6 vs Thor

Post by gregsundt »

dasanchezr wrote:this horn is doing the job quite well
Since that is the case, I wouldn't be in a hurry to switch, inless the conductor clearly wants a different sound. You will get a range of opinions, but you, your conductor and your section should spend some "face time" with any alternatives before switching, even for well-defined reasons.

All the tubas you mention are world-class instruments, and each has its benefits and quirks. If you are touring the US any time soon, perhaps you could convince some of your colleaugues who own other pro-quality CCs to meet you and let you try them: solo and with the section.
"The only problem with that tuba is, it does everything you tell it to!" - Robert LeBlanc
barry grrr-ero
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:40 am

Re: Rotary and Piston PT6 vs Thor

Post by barry grrr-ero »

I know one thing: you sound really great on that Thor. I've heard you once in concert, and many times on recordings.
Post Reply