alternate leadpipe for Reynolds (large/.687 bore)

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
TheGoyWonder
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:11 am

alternate leadpipe for Reynolds (large/.687 bore)

Post by TheGoyWonder »

The leadpipe on a large detachable bell Reynolds has the smallest starting OD known to man at .50" right out of the receiver. Anybody ever tried a different leadpipe/receiver on one, of a normal .56-.58" starting OD range? Hopefully it would raise the threshold for "ratting" at FF while maintaining otherwise good playing characteristics.

There are lots of tubas with a .68x" bore and about 12" leadpipe that could be rebent, like King or any Eb bass, or is the "stock" U-bend-it leadpipe of the right profile for 12"+ length from valve to receiver?
aqualung
bugler
bugler
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:34 am

Re: alternate leadpipe for Reynolds (large/.687 bore)

Post by aqualung »

Kanstul sent a .656 leadpipe instead of the .687 we had asked for. We already had it bent before we discovered the error.
So we expanded the big end to fit the cluster, and tried it. The Reynolds plays better this way than with the original pipe. Go figure.
TheGoyWonder
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:11 am

Re: alternate leadpipe for Reynolds (large/.687 bore)

Post by TheGoyWonder »

Cool! do you think there's anything special in your .656 :arrow: .687 expansion or would a straight .687 be better? What receiver did you use?
aqualung
bugler
bugler
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:34 am

Re: alternate leadpipe for Reynolds (large/.687 bore)

Post by aqualung »

The pipe and the receiver were from Kanstul.
Post Reply