Dillon 1795, 641, and 12915 Tubas
-
- bugler
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 2:02 pm
- Location: North Carolina, USA
Dillon 1795, 641, and 12915 Tubas
Can anyone provide feedback on the Dillon Music line of BBb tubas, especially models 1795, 641 and 12915? I'm particularly interested in the intonation, build quality, valve quality and reliability of the Dillon tubas compared to other Chinese made tubas, and their relatively value compared to new or used instruments like the Cerveny 686, Miraphone 184 / 186, Meinl Weston 25, or B&S GR51 models. Thanks.
Last edited by WagnerRing on Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- 6 valves
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:44 am
- Location: With my fellow Thought Criminals
Re: Dillon 1795, 641, and 12915 Tubas
I've played the 1795 model, oddly named after it's price, or so it seems.
It feels between 3/4 and full size but is light, has decent sound and a long stack on it.
I don't know what it is a clone of.
The lead pipe is oddly placed and interferes with where I naturally hold onto the tuba and fear I could damage or crush it.
Although I prefer pistons, the paddles on this rotary felt smaller and faster than other full size tubas.
I liked its feel and sound while playing.
I can't speak for the durability of the valves except that which is well known and documented on these pages for affordable JB/Chinaclone tubas.
It feels between 3/4 and full size but is light, has decent sound and a long stack on it.
I don't know what it is a clone of.
The lead pipe is oddly placed and interferes with where I naturally hold onto the tuba and fear I could damage or crush it.
Although I prefer pistons, the paddles on this rotary felt smaller and faster than other full size tubas.
I liked its feel and sound while playing.
I can't speak for the durability of the valves except that which is well known and documented on these pages for affordable JB/Chinaclone tubas.
I am committed to the advancement of civil rights, minus the Marxist intimidation and thuggery of BLM.
-
- 4 valves
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 9:10 am
- Location: Tewksbury, NJ
Re: Dillon 1795, 641, and 12915 Tubas
I owned a 1795 for about a year, and sold it because I never really got used to the feel of rotary valves (not these rotary valves, particularly, just any rotary valves). I didn't have any issues with build quality, and I think it's a decent horn at that price point. I wouldn't expect the 1795 to be of a quality similar to Miraphone, MW, etc. although I haven't owned those horns.
Hup
Hup
Do you really need Facebook?
- bigboymusic
- 3 valves
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:54 am
- Location: Independence, MO
Re: Dillon 1795, 641, and 12915 Tubas
We have 2 of the 641's we purchased for our school. The rotors need to be oiled more often than the actual Yamaha 641 we have, but I love them. The intonation is actually a little more consistent in the staff. KILLER low range. I have them on PT-48's. I am a believer!!!!!
I have used one of these in a pops orchestra setting, and it put the
bottom on our 90 piece group with no effort...
The case sucks.......
I have used one of these in a pops orchestra setting, and it put the
bottom on our 90 piece group with no effort...
The case sucks.......
Paul Weissenborn
St. Joseph Symphony Orchestra (MO)
Spirit of Independence Band
SJSO Quintet
Alex 163 CC
YEB 321S
St. Joseph Symphony Orchestra (MO)
Spirit of Independence Band
SJSO Quintet
Alex 163 CC
YEB 321S