MAW valves revisited

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
The Big Ben
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 3169
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 11:54 am
Location: Port Townsend, WA

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by The Big Ben »

nworbekim wrote: my King 2341 plays great... but i've never been really really happy with the valves. i think if i could get them going i'd be happy but it seems like i just can't get them to go as fast as i want.
Tell us a little more here. It is my understanding that the MAW valve is more about the way that the air flows through the horn rather than the mechanical movement of the piston up and down. A MAW valve will have to be hand fit into your bores especially for your instrument. The clearances between the piston and bore are especially tight and they need to be machined or lapped to fit. What is the condition of your King valves? Are they the correct size that they need to be? Are the bores round and are the sides parallel from top to bottom? If the horn isn't that old, did it come out of the factory correct? Perhaps the refitting of your current valves would give you the action you want without the cost of the MAW valves themselves.
Voisi1ev
bugler
bugler
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:43 am
Location: Michigan

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by Voisi1ev »

I have a set on a 52J, so the C equivalent of your King. I've found they make longer valve combos feel a little more free blowing (although I know some debate the merits of this). Low range is less barky/smoother sounding. I thought softer playing was a bit easier.

That said I've always loved the default valves on these horns as far as feel of playing/moving them goes. I don't think that changes much with the MAWs.

I got a set of silver hammered caps with my MAWs. Went right back to my originals as I like the feel of the inverted/pit style valve caps. The hammered caps did look pretty baller though, I tried them on my Neo Bb but they didn't fit into the stems.

I'm pretty content with owning the set. I'd say if I went back in time, I'm like 70% likely to re purchases verses keep the money. Not life changing, but some nice changes in the feel.

I should go back and try the originals again, it has been a year.
Voisi1ev
bugler
bugler
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:43 am
Location: Michigan

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by Voisi1ev »

I should add, as mentioned they do have measurements for your horn. Mine all fit perfectly except a little the first one bound up a little. Nothing a cleaning didn't fix, not sure if they altered the valve or casing to make it work, but it didn't take much work.
tofu
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1998
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: One toke over the line...

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by tofu »

.
Last edited by tofu on Wed Dec 29, 2021 9:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tbonesullivan
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 531
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:30 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by tbonesullivan »

Have you had a good tech examine the valves to check the alignment, ports, construction, etc? Definitely worth it before springing for the MAW valves.
Yamaha YBB-631S BBb Tuba, B&H Imperial Eb Tuba, Sterling / Perantucci 1065GHS Euphonium
Yamaha YBL-621 RII Bass Trombone and a bunch of other trombones
User avatar
Alex C
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 2225
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 10:34 am
Location: Cybertexas

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by Alex C »

If you want to know whether you have G.A.S. or a real need for a new horn, practice for an additional 90 minutes a day for a couple of weeks and see how that goes. If you can't make time for the 90 extra minutes, buy the horn, you have G.A.S. :D :D
City Intonation Inspector - Dallas Texas
"Holding the Bordognian Fabric of the Universe together through better pitch, one note at a time."

Practicing results in increased atmospheric CO2 thus causing global warming.
Voisi1ev
bugler
bugler
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:43 am
Location: Michigan

Re: MAW valves revisited

Post by Voisi1ev »

nworbekim wrote:
thank you... that sounds encouraging. do you feel like they're quicker than the originals?


I never had a problem with the hand feel of the originals, I bought my horn used in 2002, so I'm assuming it was in the first bit of production.
Post Reply