Okay. Those horns I mentioned were just examples of the variety of horns you could possibly use. As in one of that largest and one of the smallest. And I say as good as we have now because of how far tubas have come. For example the craftsmanship, the many different horns you could can choose from, etc. I don't think back then they had places like WWBW or Custom Music.UncleBeer wrote:Huh? While those particular models may not have existed then, they most certainly had (Big ***-) Kaiser tubas. And just how is it that you know that they were "by no means is it as good as we have now"?

I kinda figured that you wouldn't use a BIG tuba. Again, this falls under what I was saying earlier of whatever sounds good and is good with the ensemble.UncleBeer wrote:It occasionally gets played that way; but what's more important is that although Berlioz was thoroughly aware of the bass- and contrabass tubas and their potential, he almost exclusively wrote for either ophicleides, serpents, or a combination thereof 'til his death in 1869. Also not trivial: he ranted long and loud about musicians who saw fit to "improve" his music with their own changes. Does this mean we all oughta take up the ophicleide? No. A better approach is to use that expensive college education, and whatever common sense God gave you, and leave the York copy at home during Berlioz week.
Ralph