"loud mouthpieces vs. gw mouthpieces"

Charlie Goodman · Post by **Charlie Goodman** » Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:37 pm

I think by "personal results are welcome" he meant that he wasn't just looking for an answer that was right for him, he wanted to see what people thought.

Paul S · Post by **Paul S** » Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:24 am

Both mouthpiece lines are extremely high quality.
Both owners/makers are the best sort of people you could ever want to deal with.

I give the advantage to Loud due to its screw rim system that allows you to choose a more ideal rim size for each individual's personal taste in addition to choosing cup depth, ID, throat, backbore etc...

I do like the lighter weight stainless like the Baer.

I really liked the Alan Baer and could have loved it with a different rim. With the LM-7 I could change the rim to match my preference more.

TubaRay · Post by **TubaRay** » Fri Sep 09, 2005 8:27 am

bloke wrote: The main thing (in my view) that Joe lacks in his mouthpiece line is cool names...

Hey Joey-boy: How 'bout renaming all of your 'pieces (instead of those boring-*ss numbers) model designations such as Ercumongashee (Bach 18 knock-off), Gorgobsolobahh (Conn Helleberg), Mushu-pork (PT-88++), Abrakadabra (C4)...etc.

You know, names that make perfect logical sense and that clearly point towards the similar mouthpieces on which they are roughly based...

Good point! LOL