More opinions on Kellyberg anyone

The bulk of the musical talk
Post Reply
User avatar
Leland
pro musician
pro musician
Posts: 1651
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Washington, DC

Post by Leland »

I used one for almost our entire West coast tour, and have been going back to it now & then lately.

Because of how grippy it is, you really do have to play differently.

Also -- maybe because of its light weight -- it's fairly easy for me to overblow, especially when compared to a Marty Erickson 5 that I usually use. For the first time in quite a while, I tried my Kellyberg again late last week, and within two notes I had to back off just to sound normal.

It's certainly cheap enough to experiment. But, its plastic construction is definitely its best feature. I'm hoping to eventually get a Perantucci or Doug Elliot with a plastic rim. I'm also hoping to hear more news someday about the guy who's come up with a more slippery plastic compound that better duplicates the "feel" of metals.
User avatar
Z-Tuba Dude
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1327
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Lurking in the shadows of NYC!

Post by Z-Tuba Dude »

Does it have a good color to the sound similar to a normal Helleberg?
My Kellyberg has great color! (bright green) :D
User avatar
Dan Schultz
TubaTinker
TubaTinker
Posts: 10424
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:46 pm
Location: Newburgh, Indiana
Contact:

Post by Dan Schultz »

A friend of mine is a dealer and sell quite a few of the Kellybergs. He gave me one to 'try out'. It does not compare very well to either the Conn Helleberg or the 7B. I'll keep it around for outside cold-weather gigs but for general playing I'll stick with my metal mouthpieces.
Dan Schultz
"The Village Tinker"
http://www.thevillagetinker.com" target="_blank
Current 'stable'... Rudolf Meinl 5/4, Marzan (by Willson) euph, King 2341, Alphorn, and other strange stuff.
User avatar
tubaspmcc
bugler
bugler
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 2:34 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by tubaspmcc »

TubaTinker wrote:I'll keep it around for outside cold-weather gigs but for general playing I'll stick with my metal mouthpieces.
I agree - great for cold-weather and marching gigs (or hot weather gigs!), but doesn't really have the sound (with 982 Besson) to carry a band generally speaking.

Simon McCauley
User avatar
Daryl Fletcher
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 12:24 pm

Kellyberg

Post by Daryl Fletcher »

I have been using a Kellyberg for about two months now. I used a Shilke 66 in the 80's, and got a gold-plated Chuck Daellenbach mouthpiece a few years ago. I have noticed that the low range is better with the Kellyberg, which I'm guessing has a lot more to do with slight variations in the dimensions than the materials used.
Last edited by Daryl Fletcher on Tue Jun 01, 2004 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
DonShirer
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 571
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Westbrook, CT

Post by DonShirer »

I just received a Kelleyberg in the post. My first impressions are favorable. The high range on my Eb tuba seems more in tune than with a Bach 18 but the notes seemed a little harder to attack cleanly. That will probably go away with practice. I probably won't use it for everything, but I definitely will use it often.
Mark

Post by Mark »

I finally gave in and bought one. After playing on it for a few days here are my two strongest impressions:

1) It really doesn't sound bad at all. I'm not going to make it my main mouthpiece, but it is quite acceptable.

2) It is even lighter than I thought it would be. And, given #1, it has me thinkiing that heavy-weight mouthpieces probably don't play better.
Post Reply