Aw, come on! Crush the little sucker like a bug!schlepporello wrote:I'll be danged if I'll allow chair try-outs between myself and a middle school student.

And then it just happens that the kid is allergic to poison ivy and dies, and poor Schlepp gets schlepped off to jail.SplatterTone wrote:Rub the mouthpiece in poison ivy.
The hands down winner, in my opinion.Tom Mason wrote:I refrained from posting until now because I wanted to see where this would go, so here it is............................
If your music minister has the intellegence that he/she should have, then they know the score already. A brief talk with them should help solve the situation.
If the minister does nothing about the situation, then maybe its time to consider trying to form a small quintet/group out of the upper level players and do something in parallel with the orchestra.
Hopefully, the minister will address the kid. The kid needs to realize that he is being a destructive part of the group. No matter how he feels about playing in church, a participant should never be a negative in a positive situation. As a church music minister, I would remove a person who is being a negative influence in the group. Yes, I would try to get the kid to change his/her ways, but there is a point that one's behavior will cause others in a group to falter. When that point is reached, action needs to happen.
As for your participation, hang in there. (Not trying to preach here) There are times when outside influences will try to keep you from a worship experience. The kid may not know it, but he might be a tool to keep you from a worship experience. On the other hand, he might be the way for you to be a positive influence in someone's life, even though its not obvious now. Whatever you do, don't give in to being driven away from your service in worship.
If it helps, I have driven away from participation in worship before, and I regret the times I didn't take a firmer stand.
Hope this helps.
Tom Mason
Given that this is a church orchestra, I must agree with the above. Contrary to the other suggestions of moving on to another group, or it not being your place to correct this behavior, it is your (and the rest of the congregations's) responsibility to do so.Tom Mason wrote:On the other hand, he might be the way for you to be a positive influence in someone's life, even though its not obvious now.
I agree 100%Joe Baker wrote:
The hands down winner, in my opinion.Tom Mason wrote:I refrained from posting until now because I wanted to see where this would go, so here it is............................
If your music minister has the intellegence that he/she should have, then they know the score already. A brief talk with them should help solve the situation.
If the minister does nothing about the situation, then maybe its time to consider trying to form a small quintet/group out of the upper level players and do something in parallel with the orchestra.
Hopefully, the minister will address the kid. The kid needs to realize that he is being a destructive part of the group. No matter how he feels about playing in church, a participant should never be a negative in a positive situation. As a church music minister, I would remove a person who is being a negative influence in the group. Yes, I would try to get the kid to change his/her ways, but there is a point that one's behavior will cause others in a group to falter. When that point is reached, action needs to happen.
As for your participation, hang in there. (Not trying to preach here) There are times when outside influences will try to keep you from a worship experience. The kid may not know it, but he might be a tool to keep you from a worship experience. On the other hand, he might be the way for you to be a positive influence in someone's life, even though its not obvious now. Whatever you do, don't give in to being driven away from your service in worship.
If it helps, I have driven away from participation in worship before, and I regret the times I didn't take a firmer stand.
Hope this helps.
Tom Mason
__________________________________
Joe Baker, who was thinking the same thing, but could have never put it so well.
Now what good is an unprotected guard tower?schlepporello wrote:Right out front of the administration buildings is a small rectangular section of land that's surrounded by a very tall heavy chain link fence and topped with some of the nastiest looking razor wire I've ever seen. In the center of this is a guard tower. There's nothing visible inside the fence except the tower. This leads me to believe that there's something REALLY sensitive under that particular bit of turf. I figure if a man really wanted to committ suicide, that would be the place to drive straight into.
Well, shoot ...schlepporello wrote:I dunno, but it's got bullet holes all over it.Kevin Hendrick wrote:You don't suppose ... nah, couldn't be York #3 ... could it?SplatterTone wrote:The tower is just a decoy. The good stuff is in the trunk of that old Studebaker Commander up on blocks outside the fence.
Jumping in before I finish the thread....you have demonstrated my concept of Original Sin. Wherby the sins of the grandparents are visited upon the offspring; as in, sneer at them young enough and they will develop such a case of insecurity that they, too, will be driven to sneering. It takes much maturity to get over that, and most won't develop it until it is too late for their own offspring.schlepporello wrote:Naw, the "Master" has always lived here. I'm told that his parents are also the types who are "never wrong". Apparently this is an inherited trait.knuxie wrote:This kid didn't happen to just move recently from, say, the Dallas area, did he? He seems very familiar....
Ken F.
Wow!? They have fingering charts for scales!? If only I'd that sooner, my life ...schlepporello wrote:But when called upon to play any kind of scale I don't have to use the absence of a fingering chart as an excuse.