corbasse wrote:Here's the main confusion in this discussion. Unlike in movable Do, this system is about the actual name of the note and literally thanslates as Do=C, Re=D etc.
Si is not used for a leading tone. Si is simply the name for the note we (you) call B, regardless of what key or even what tonal system (if any) you're in. Any blob in the middle of the staff in treble clef is called a Si.
Sharps and flats are added the same way you English speakers do when talking about pitch. G sharp becomes Sol dièse /Sol sostenido (the word for sharp of flat depending on which language you speak)
I have to admit that I have always been a little foggy in my understanding of how fixed Do is used. I think I
may be getting it, though.....
It seems to me as if we are really talking apples, and oranges, when comparing fixed, and movable Do.
It seems, based on the discussion, that fixed Do is not really a "system" designed to "teach" intervalic relationships per se, but rather, it is just a different way of naming the notes. Thus: singing "Do, Re, Mi, Fa, ...etc.", is the same as someone else just singing pitches by the note names "C---, D---, E---, F---, ...etc. That is all.
The movable Do system, on the other hand, seems to be an attempt to codify the tonal relationships, in a way that can be "easily" taught to a student.
The two systems seem to have very different objectives.
Am I goofy about all of this?
Now, I realize that fixed Do has been taught for thousands of years, but I am really curious about exactly
how students of fixed Do, are taught to hear the chromatic alterations of the scale. What system does a teacher employ to get their students to hear those chromatic changes?
Does anybody here actully teach fixed Do solfege???