Any news from NAMM?

The bulk of the musical talk
User avatar
Bandmaster
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 778
Joined: Sat May 15, 2004 3:33 am
Location: Upland, CA
Contact:

Post by Bandmaster »

sbring wrote:
Bandmaster wrote:I had a "Sanders Custom" tuba for a couple of years and it was a copy of the Miraphone 191. It played good except for a problem with "popping" when sluring.
I have this very problem on one of my tubas. What might cause it?

Sven
I couldn't figure it out, that's why I sold it. I had the valves vented thinking that would help, but it only marginally helped. The second valve popped very noticably and it made it hard to play slurred passages cleanly. I asked around and could find any answers that made any sense.
Dave Schaafsma
Image
1966 Holton 345 | 1955 York-Master | 1939 York 716 | 1940 York 702 | 1968 Besson 226 | 1962 Miraphone 186 | 1967 Olds | 1923 Keefer EEb | 1895 Conn Eb | 1927 Conn 38K | 1919 Martin Helicon
poomshanka
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 682
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by poomshanka »

Chuck(G) wrote:Isn't that big Holton BBb just a rebadged Yamaha YBB-321?
Image

They sure do look the same to me. I can't make out the inscription on the Holton, but if it's a "Collegiate" model, then yes - they're being stenciled by Weril.
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

And again, for that matter, Bach piston low brass also looks like stencil Yamaha. Compare the tubas, especially!
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
User avatar
Chuck(G)
6 valves
6 valves
Posts: 5679
Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2004 12:48 am
Location: Not out of the woods yet.
Contact:

Post by Chuck(G) »

Are Kanstul and King the only domestic US producers of tubas?

Sigh. With the way US manufacturing is going, I suspect that this will soon be the Ford Camel:

Image
User avatar
Barney
bugler
bugler
Posts: 131
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 10:56 am
Location: NYC

Post by Barney »

User avatar
SplatterTone
5 valves
5 valves
Posts: 1906
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:17 pm
Location: Tulsa, OK
Contact:

Post by SplatterTone »

Are Kanstul and King the only domestic US producers of tubas?
The "Big 3" are going in on a joint venture to make tubas. Fischer Body will make the majority of it; Chrysler will produce the "Hemi" valves.

And Ford will add some component that will eventually burst into flames.
Good signature lines: http://tinyurl.com/a47spm
jacobg
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:59 pm
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Post by jacobg »

Chuck(G) wrote:Isn't that big Holton BBb just a rebadged Yamaha YBB-321?
They've been doing that for years. I have one from the 80's, identical to these pictures except without the flip in the 3rd valve slide. It has a Holton medallion on the tuning slide and a Yamaha-like serial number on the second valve (starts with 00).
Mine is bb340r, the 4 valve convertable model (why does this exist?!?).
User avatar
iiipopes
Utility Infielder
Utility Infielder
Posts: 8580
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 1:10 am

Post by iiipopes »

The Conn 5XJ series are modified King 1241's. The sousaphones may be made in the USA, although the Jupiter fiberglass is the exact same design as the pre-UMI Kings, and may be subcontracted out.

I emailed J. Michael. Until they get a distributor in place, they will sell direct for retail + shipping.
Jupiter JTU1110
"Real" Conn 36K
poomshanka
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 682
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by poomshanka »

Barney wrote:Here's a GREAT report from NAMM:

http://forum.samburtis.com/viewtopic.ph ... hlight=url
Great post - thanx for the link.

...D
Shockwave
3 valves
3 valves
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 7:27 pm

Post by Shockwave »

poomshanka wrote: The sound has been described like a volume knob. Play something balls-out, then play the same thing soft, and it just sounds like someone turned down the volume. The character of the sound doesn't change at all. Unlike some BATs I've played that tub and woof out when played soft, this thing never changes.
I guess I'd have to hear it, but seems like it would be boring to listen to a tuba that sounds exactly the same on any note, high or low, loud or soft. You won't know whether the tuba is getting louder or getting closer. Remember when people were complaining that synthesizers were going to replace instruments? Now it sounds like they are making an instrument to replace a synthesizer!

-Eric
User avatar
WilliamVance
bugler
bugler
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 1:18 am
Location: Reno, Nevada

Post by WilliamVance »

Barney wrote:Here's a GREAT report from NAMM:

http://forum.samburtis.com/viewtopic.ph ... hlight=url
I especially liked the references to "Monica" and her name... :shock:
poomshanka
4 valves
4 valves
Posts: 682
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 10:54 pm
Location: Parts Unknown

Post by poomshanka »

Shockwave wrote:I guess I'd have to hear it, but seems like it would be boring to listen to a tuba that sounds exactly the same on any note, high or low, loud or soft. You won't know whether the tuba is getting louder or getting closer. Remember when people were complaining that synthesizers were going to replace instruments? Now it sounds like they are making an instrument to replace a synthesizer!
Apparently my observations left room for misinterpretation - my bad. Allow me to clarify...

This tuba is not an on/off switch, i.e. it doesn't just "do its thing" regardless of who's playing it. It is, instead, the shortest distance I've ever experienced between what's "in my ear" and what comes out of the bell. Boring? Hardly. Loud/soft? Sure. "Getting closer"? Uhh, I guess if the player's moving back-n-forth on the stage? Not sure what to make of that acoustical requirement.

IMHO one of the best playing *and* sounding tubas I've ever experienced, if not *the* best. Subjective interpretation? Sure, why not? I'm not speaking here on anyone else's behalf but my own (and no, I'm not shilling for Yamahooters!).

Although I didn't spend hours with the axe, I'd have to say that in the 15 miuntes or so I played it, I found out some things I really liked. The sound is, to my ear, capable of being very exciting - a great blend of heat and breadth. From a feel standpoint, it seemed quite responsive to everything I asked it to do.

By saying the sound retained all of its character regardless of volume is, IMHO, a pretty big plus. Personally, I don't want to feel like my horn should be named Sybil - one way high, another low, this way loud, another way soft, oh and those notes get a little wolfy, and... you get the idea. The 826 responds favorably to different types of input, and you can shade/color the sound pretty easily. That's obviously within the context that it's a BAT, i.e. you might find some challenges in making it sound like a Miraphone 184... although it almost plays as easily as one. In a certain sense, you might even say there's a nice neutrality to the horn, in that it's going to interpret what you're putting into it pretty accurately.

Program a synthesizer to do certain things, and it will precisely execute down to the Nth degree. I don't necessarily think that to be "human" you have to be sloppy. Precision's not such a bad thing, is it? Always nice to know that when the light's on, your horn won't be tripping you up.

Ahh, yes - semantics. How to put words to a sound, or a feel. Not much about this horn to not like.... except maybe the price.... and the availability.... but that's another story...

...Dave
Post Reply